ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)
COP leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — COP vs XOM
growth of $100 · last 30yCOP +658.6%XOM +600.0%COP compounded faster
COP XOM
COP vs XOM: by the numbers
- •XOM is the larger company ($609.33B vs $142.52B market cap).
- •COP trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.89 vs 24.79 P/E).
- •COP converts more revenue to profit (12.56% vs 7.76% net margin).
- •COP grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.71% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •COP pays the higher dividend yield (2.82% vs 2.78%).
Which is better, COP or XOM?
Metric tally: COP 12 · XOM 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCOP(lower P/E)
GrowthCOP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCOP(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.89● | 24.79 |
| Forward P/E | 13.01● | 14.15 |
| P/S ratio | 2.46 | 1.89● |
| P/B ratio | 2.22● | 2.42 |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.57● | 10.82 |
| FCF yield | 12.79%● | 3.06% |
Profitability
| Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.18%● | 25.49% |
| Operating margin | 18.28%● | 9.01% |
| Net margin | 12.56%● | 7.76% |
| ROE | 11.34%● | 9.95% |
| ROIC | 6.72%● | 6.34% |
Dividends
| Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.78% |
| Payout ratio | 51.89% | 61.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.71%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.18% | 12.08%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 104.64%● | 36.20% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.54% | 23.23%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COP or XOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: COP (lower P/E); growth: COP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: COP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, COP leads 12 to 3.
- Is COP or XOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, COP is cheaper: COP trades at a 19.89 P/E and XOM at 24.79.
- Which has grown faster, COP or XOM?
- Over the past five years, COP grew revenue faster — COP at a 20.71% CAGR versus XOM at 12.49%.
- Does COP or XOM pay a bigger dividend?
- COP yields 2.82% and XOM yields 2.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COP or XOM more profitable?
- COP runs the higher net margin — COP at 12.56% versus XOM at 7.76%.
- Which has been the better investment, COP or XOM?
- Over the past 10-year, COP delivered the higher annualized total return — COP at 13.65% versus XOM at 9.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ConocoPhillips P/E ratioExxon Mobil P/E ratioConocoPhillips dividend yieldExxon Mobil dividend yieldConocoPhillips ROEExxon Mobil ROEConocoPhillips operating marginExxon Mobil operating marginConocoPhillips revenue growthExxon Mobil revenue growthConocoPhillips free cash flowExxon Mobil free cash flow
ConocoPhillips & Exxon Mobil appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.