ConocoPhillips (COP) vs The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB)
COP leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of ConocoPhillips and The Williams Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — COP vs WMB
growth of $100 · last 30yCOP +618.4%WMB +496.2%COP compounded faster
COP WMB
COP vs WMB: by the numbers
- •COP is the larger company ($134.88B vs $87.42B market cap).
- •COP trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.09 vs 31.21 P/E).
- •WMB converts more revenue to profit (23.82% vs 12.56% net margin).
- •COP grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.71% vs 7.21% CAGR).
- •COP pays the higher dividend yield (2.94% vs 2.87%).
Which is better, COP or WMB?
Metric tally: COP 10 · WMB 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCOP(lower P/E)
GrowthCOP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCOP(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOP(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COP | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.09● | 31.21 |
| Forward P/E | 12.48● | 28.24 |
| P/S ratio | 2.36● | 7.33 |
| P/B ratio | 2.13● | 6.73 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.33● | 16.47 |
| FCF yield | 11.19%● | 0.83% |
Profitability
| Metric | COP | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.18% | 62.85%● |
| Operating margin | 18.28% | 38.79%● |
| Net margin | 12.56% | 23.82%● |
| ROE | 11.34% | 21.85%● |
| ROIC | 6.54%● | 6.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | COP | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.94%● | 2.87% |
| Payout ratio | 51.89% | 95.79% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COP | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.71%● | 7.21% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.18% | 65.97%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 97.59%● | -21.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.81% | 26.81%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COP or WMB?
- It depends on your goal. value: COP (lower P/E); growth: COP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: COP (higher dividend yield); quality: COP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, COP leads 10 to 6.
- Is COP or WMB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, COP is cheaper: COP trades at a 19.09 P/E and WMB at 31.21.
- Which has grown faster, COP or WMB?
- Over the past five years, COP grew revenue faster — COP at a 20.71% CAGR versus WMB at 7.21%.
- Does COP or WMB pay a bigger dividend?
- COP yields 2.94% and WMB yields 2.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COP or WMB more profitable?
- WMB runs the higher net margin — COP at 12.56% versus WMB at 23.82%.
- Which has been the better investment, COP or WMB?
- Over the past 10-year, WMB delivered the higher annualized total return — COP at 13.39% versus WMB at 18.41%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ConocoPhillips P/E ratioWilliams Companies P/E ratioConocoPhillips dividend yieldWilliams Companies dividend yieldConocoPhillips ROEWilliams Companies ROEConocoPhillips operating marginWilliams Companies operating marginConocoPhillips revenue growthWilliams Companies revenue growthConocoPhillips free cash flowWilliams Companies free cash flow
ConocoPhillips & Williams Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.