The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH)
ZBH leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Cooper Companies, Inc. and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
COO
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
$65.91Healthcare
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
$87.97Healthcare
Total return — COO vs ZBH
growth of $100 · last 25yCOO +1036.4%ZBH +204.7%COO compounded faster
COO ZBH
COO vs ZBH: by the numbers
- •ZBH is the larger company ($17.02B vs $12.85B market cap).
- •ZBH trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.85 vs 55.86 P/E).
- •ZBH converts more revenue to profit (9.05% vs 5.57% net margin).
- •COO grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.73% vs 4.21% CAGR).
- •ZBH pays a dividend (1.09% yield) while COO does not currently pay one.
Which is better, COO or ZBH?
Metric tally: COO 2 · ZBH 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueZBH(lower P/E)
GrowthCOO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityZBH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COO | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 55.86 | 22.85● |
| Forward P/E | 14.23 | 9.77● |
| P/S ratio | 3.04 | 2.05● |
| P/B ratio | 1.56 | 1.36● |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.52 | 11.00● |
| FCF yield | 4.43% | 10.66%● |
Profitability
| Metric | COO | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.37% | 70.03%● |
| Operating margin | 11.77% | 15.61%● |
| Net margin | 5.57% | 9.05%● |
| ROE | 2.86% | 6.01%● |
| ROIC | 3.98% | 5.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | COO | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.09% |
| Payout ratio | — | 26.97% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COO | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.73%● | 4.21% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.30% | -7.05%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.61% | 15.41%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.24%● | -9.82% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COO or ZBH?
- It depends on your goal. value: ZBH (lower P/E); growth: COO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ZBH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ZBH leads 13 to 2.
- Is COO or ZBH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ZBH is cheaper: COO trades at a 55.86 P/E and ZBH at 22.85.
- Which has grown faster, COO or ZBH?
- Over the past five years, COO grew revenue faster — COO at a 9.73% CAGR versus ZBH at 4.21%.
- Does COO or ZBH pay a bigger dividend?
- ZBH pays a dividend (1.09% yield) while COO does not currently pay one.
- Is COO or ZBH more profitable?
- ZBH runs the higher net margin — COO at 5.57% versus ZBH at 9.05%.
- Which has been the better investment, COO or ZBH?
- Over the past 10-year, COO delivered the higher annualized total return — COO at 5.01% versus ZBH at -1.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cooper Companies P/E ratioZimmer Biomet P/E ratioCooper Companies dividend yieldZimmer Biomet dividend yieldCooper Companies ROEZimmer Biomet ROECooper Companies operating marginZimmer Biomet operating marginCooper Companies revenue growthZimmer Biomet revenue growthCooper Companies free cash flowZimmer Biomet free cash flow
Cooper Companies & Zimmer Biomet appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.