Global X - MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE)
Over the past 3 years, ROE lagged COLO — 23.75% vs 38.55% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Global X - MSCI Colombia ETF and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — COLO vs ROE
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3yMetrics side by side
Did ROE beat COLO?
Over the past 3 years, ROE lagged COLO — 23.75% vs 38.55% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | COLO | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 49.08% | 24.38% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 38.55% | 23.75% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.85% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 6.95% | N/A |
COLO is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has ROE beaten COLO?
- Over the past 3 years, ROE lagged COLO — 23.75% vs 38.55% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.