Global X - MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
Over the past 10 years, NMS lagged COLO — 1.71% vs 6.29% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Global X - MSCI Colombia ETF and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — COLO vs NMS
growth of $100 · last 12yMetrics side by side
Did NMS beat COLO?
Over the past 10 years, NMS lagged COLO — 1.71% vs 6.29% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | COLO | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 50.45%● | 13.67% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 34.33%● | 9.21% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.20%● | -0.65% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 6.29%● | 1.71% |
COLO is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has NMS beaten COLO?
- Over the past 10 years, NMS lagged COLO — 1.71% vs 6.29% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.