Global X - MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
Over the past 10 years, NMS lagged COLO — 0.32% vs 7.82% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Global X - MSCI Colombia ETF and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — COLO vs NMS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMetrics side by side
Did NMS beat COLO?
Over the past 10 years, NMS lagged COLO — 0.32% vs 7.82% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | COLO | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 66.06% | -4.82% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 45.68% | 7.03% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 20.48% | -2.81% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 7.82% | 0.32% |
COLO is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has NMS beaten COLO?
- Over the past 10 years, NMS lagged COLO — 0.32% vs 7.82% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.