Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) vs Wingstop Inc. (WING)
A side-by-side comparison of Columbia Sportswear Company and Wingstop Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
$56.93Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WING
Wingstop Inc.
$106.84Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — COLM vs WING
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCOLM +14.9% (+1.4%/yr)WING +328.3% (+15.7%/yr)WING compounded faster over this window
COLM WING
COLM vs WING: by the numbers
- •COLM is the larger company ($2.91B vs $2.91B market cap).
- •COLM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.79 vs 25.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •WING converts more revenue to profit (16.15% vs 6.05% net margin).
- •WING grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.51% vs 3.93% CAGR).
- •COLM pays the higher dividend yield (2.11% vs 1.15%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COLM | WING |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.79 | 25.38 |
| Forward P/E | 12.49 | 24.18 |
| PEG ratio | 0.99 | 0.49 |
| P/S ratio | 0.85 | 4.04 |
| P/B ratio | 1.82 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.84 | 17.37 |
| FCF yield | 11.04% | 4.41% |
Profitability
| Metric | COLM | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.02% | 82.62% |
| Operating margin | 7.78% | 28.69% |
| Net margin | 6.05% | 16.15% |
| ROE | 12.86% | N/A |
| ROIC | 9.69% | 25.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | COLM | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.11% | 1.15% |
| Payout ratio | 31.17% | 29.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COLM | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.93% | 21.51% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.73% | 51.11% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -4.62% | 16.49% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.99% | -8.00% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, COLM or WING?
- COLM has the lower trailing P/E: COLM trades at 14.79 and WING at 25.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, COLM or WING?
- Over the past five years, WING grew revenue faster — COLM at a 3.93% CAGR versus WING at 21.51%.
- Does COLM or WING pay a bigger dividend?
- COLM yields 2.11% and WING yields 1.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COLM or WING more profitable?
- WING runs the higher net margin — COLM at 6.05% versus WING at 16.15%.
- How have COLM and WING total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, COLM delivered 1.36% and WING delivered 15.50% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Columbia Sportswear P/E ratioWingstop P/E ratioColumbia Sportswear dividend yieldWingstop dividend yieldColumbia Sportswear ROEWingstop ROEColumbia Sportswear operating marginWingstop operating marginColumbia Sportswear revenue growthWingstop revenue growthColumbia Sportswear free cash flowWingstop free cash flow
Columbia Sportswear & Wingstop appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.