Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) vs Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO)
A side-by-side comparison of Columbia Sportswear Company and Steven Madden, Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
$57.32Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT
SHOO
Steven Madden, Ltd.
$45.29Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT
Total return — COLM vs SHOO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCOLM +11.3% (+1.1%/yr)SHOO +128.4% (+8.6%/yr)SHOO compounded faster over this window
COLM SHOO
COLM vs SHOO: by the numbers
- •SHOO is the larger company ($3.31B vs $2.93B market cap).
- •COLM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.89 vs 22.65 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •COLM converts more revenue to profit (6.05% vs 5.23% net margin).
- •SHOO grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.41% vs 3.93% CAGR).
- •COLM pays the higher dividend yield (2.11% vs 1.85%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COLM | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.89 | 22.65 |
| Forward P/E | 12.58 | 20.55 |
| PEG ratio | 1.00 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 0.86 | 1.21 |
| P/B ratio | 1.83 | 3.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.90 | 15.16 |
| FCF yield | 10.96% | 6.59% |
Profitability
| Metric | COLM | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.02% | 46.06% |
| Operating margin | 7.78% | 7.40% |
| Net margin | 6.05% | 5.23% |
| ROE | 12.86% | 15.25% |
| ROIC | 9.69% | 11.45% |
Dividends
| Metric | COLM | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.11% | 1.85% |
| Payout ratio | 31.17% | 42.00% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COLM | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.93% | 13.41% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.73% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -4.62% | 24.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.99% | 4.44% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, COLM or SHOO?
- COLM has the lower trailing P/E: COLM trades at 14.89 and SHOO at 22.65. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, COLM or SHOO?
- Over the past five years, SHOO grew revenue faster — COLM at a 3.93% CAGR versus SHOO at 13.41%.
- Does COLM or SHOO pay a bigger dividend?
- COLM yields 2.11% and SHOO yields 1.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COLM or SHOO more profitable?
- COLM runs the higher net margin — COLM at 6.05% versus SHOO at 5.23%.
- How have COLM and SHOO total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, COLM delivered 1.36% and SHOO delivered 8.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Columbia Sportswear P/E ratioSteven Madden P/E ratioColumbia Sportswear dividend yieldSteven Madden dividend yieldColumbia Sportswear ROESteven Madden ROEColumbia Sportswear operating marginSteven Madden operating marginColumbia Sportswear revenue growthSteven Madden revenue growthColumbia Sportswear free cash flowSteven Madden free cash flow
Columbia Sportswear & Steven Madden appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.