Which has the lower trailing P/E, COLM or OSW?

COLM has the lower trailing P/E: COLM trades at 14.92 and OSW at 29.18. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, COLM or OSW?

Over the past five years, OSW grew revenue faster — COLM at a 3.93% CAGR versus OSW at 118.32%.

Does COLM or OSW pay a bigger dividend?

COLM yields 2.11% and OSW yields 0.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is COLM or OSW more profitable?

OSW runs the higher net margin — COLM at 6.05% versus OSW at 8.02%.

How have COLM and OSW total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, COLM delivered -7.99% and OSW delivered 17.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) vs OneSpaWorld Holdings Ltd (OSW)

A side-by-side comparison of Columbia Sportswear Company and OneSpaWorld Holdings Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

COLM

Columbia Sportswear Company

$2.94B

$57.46Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:35 PM EDT

OSW

OneSpaWorld Holdings Ltd

$2.34B

$23.05Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:35 PM EDT

Total return — COLM vs OSW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

COLM -2.2% (-0.2%/yr)OSW +141.9% (+10.3%/yr)OSW compounded faster over this window

COLM OSW

COLM vs OSW: by the numbers

•COLM is the larger company ($2.94B vs $2.34B market cap).
•COLM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.92 vs 29.18 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•OSW converts more revenue to profit (8.02% vs 6.05% net margin).
•OSW grew revenue faster over the past five years (118.32% vs 3.93% CAGR).
•COLM pays the higher dividend yield (2.11% vs 0.86%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	COLM	OSW
P/E ratio	14.92	29.18
Forward P/E	12.61	20.28
PEG ratio	1.00	N/A
P/S ratio	0.86	2.32
P/B ratio	1.83	4.02
EV / EBITDA	8.92	19.47
FCF yield	10.93%	3.34%

Profitability

Metric	COLM	OSW
Gross margin	52.02%	14.29%
Operating margin	7.78%	9.48%
Net margin	6.05%	8.02%
ROE	12.86%	13.90%
ROIC	9.69%	13.60%

Dividends

Metric	COLM	OSW
Dividend yield	2.11%	0.86%
Payout ratio	31.17%	25.32%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	COLM	OSW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.93%	118.32%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.73%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-4.62%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-7.99%	17.35%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COLM or OSW?: COLM has the lower trailing P/E: COLM trades at 14.92 and OSW at 29.18. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COLM or OSW?: Over the past five years, OSW grew revenue faster — COLM at a 3.93% CAGR versus OSW at 118.32%.
Does COLM or OSW pay a bigger dividend?: COLM yields 2.11% and OSW yields 0.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COLM or OSW more profitable?: OSW runs the higher net margin — COLM at 6.05% versus OSW at 8.02%.
How have COLM and OSW total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, COLM delivered -7.99% and OSW delivered 17.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full COLM analysis Full OSW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Columbia Sportswear P/E ratio OneSpaWorld P/E ratio Columbia Sportswear dividend yield OneSpaWorld dividend yield Columbia Sportswear ROE OneSpaWorld ROE Columbia Sportswear operating margin OneSpaWorld operating margin Columbia Sportswear revenue growth OneSpaWorld revenue growth Columbia Sportswear free cash flow OneSpaWorld free cash flow

Columbia Sportswear & OneSpaWorld appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.