Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD) vs Phillips Edison & Co. (PECO)
A side-by-side comparison of Americold Realty Trust, Inc. and Phillips Edison & Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — COLD vs PECO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yCOLD vs PECO: by the numbers
- •PECO is the larger company ($4.79B vs $4.01B market cap).
- •PECO is profitable (19.13% net margin) while COLD runs a net loss (-17.44%).
- •PECO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.01% vs 2.51% CAGR).
- •COLD pays the higher dividend yield (6.55% vs 3.48%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COLD | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 32.43 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 43.35 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.41 |
| P/S ratio | 1.53 | 6.38 |
| P/B ratio | 1.66 | 2.02 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.16 | 15.34 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 4.97% |
For REITs like Americold Realty Trust, Inc., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Phillips Edison & Co., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | COLD | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 4.02% | -1.39% |
| Operating margin | 4.51% | 29.03% |
| Net margin | -17.44% | 19.13% |
| ROE | -18.89% | 6.05% |
| ROIC | 1.64% | 4.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | COLD | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.55% | 3.48% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 113.59% |
Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Phillips Edison & Co.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COLD | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.51% | 8.01% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 78.78% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 5.16% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.27% | 7.30% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, COLD or PECO?
- Over the past five years, PECO grew revenue faster — COLD at a 2.51% CAGR versus PECO at 8.01%.
- Does COLD or PECO pay a bigger dividend?
- COLD yields 6.55% and PECO yields 3.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COLD or PECO more profitable?
- PECO runs the higher net margin — COLD at -17.44% versus PECO at 19.13%.
- How have COLD and PECO total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, COLD delivered -9.27% and PECO delivered 7.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Americold Realty Trust & Phillips Edison appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.