Which has the lower trailing P/E, CODA or TUSK?

CODA has the lower trailing P/E: CODA trades at 24.53 and TUSK at 195.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CODA or TUSK?

Over the past five years, CODA grew revenue faster — CODA at a 6.45% CAGR versus TUSK at -25.88%.

Is CODA or TUSK more profitable?

CODA runs the higher net margin — CODA at 17.63% versus TUSK at 1.23%.

How have CODA and TUSK total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CODA delivered 3.84% and TUSK delivered -2.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) vs Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)

A side-by-side comparison of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CODA

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

$123M

$10.88IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:40 PM EDT

TUSK

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

$139M

$2.90IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:35 PM EDT

Total return — CODA vs TUSK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CODA +497.8% (+19.6%/yr)TUSK -78.1% (-14.1%/yr)CODA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CODA TUSK

CODA vs TUSK: by the numbers

•TUSK is the larger company ($139M vs $123M market cap).
•CODA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.53 vs 195.61 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CODA converts more revenue to profit (17.63% vs 1.23% net margin).
•CODA grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.45% vs -25.88% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CODA	TUSK
P/E ratio	24.53	195.61
Forward P/E	23.14	N/A
PEG ratio	5.73	N/A
P/S ratio	4.29	2.31
P/B ratio	1.96	0.53
EV / EBITDA	16.66	N/A
FCF yield	4.86%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CODA	TUSK
Gross margin	66.11%	-19.33%
Operating margin	20.18%	-63.52%
Net margin	17.63%	1.23%
ROE	8.04%	0.28%
ROIC	7.73%	-8.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CODA	TUSK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.45%	-25.88%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	3.60%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.89%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.84%	-2.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CODA or TUSK?: CODA has the lower trailing P/E: CODA trades at 24.53 and TUSK at 195.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CODA or TUSK?: Over the past five years, CODA grew revenue faster — CODA at a 6.45% CAGR versus TUSK at -25.88%.
Is CODA or TUSK more profitable?: CODA runs the higher net margin — CODA at 17.63% versus TUSK at 1.23%.
How have CODA and TUSK total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CODA delivered 3.84% and TUSK delivered -2.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CODA analysis Full TUSK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Coda Octopus P/E ratio Mammoth Energy Services P/E ratio Coda Octopus ROE Mammoth Energy Services ROE Coda Octopus operating margin Mammoth Energy Services operating margin Coda Octopus revenue growth Mammoth Energy Services revenue growth Coda Octopus free cash flow Mammoth Energy Services free cash flow

Coda Octopus & Mammoth Energy Services appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.