Which has the lower trailing P/E, CNXN or PAYO?

CNXN has the lower trailing P/E: CNXN trades at 24.44 and PAYO at 52.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CNXN or PAYO?

Over the past five years, PAYO grew revenue faster — CNXN at a 2.28% CAGR versus PAYO at 22.21%.

Does CNXN or PAYO pay a bigger dividend?

CNXN pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while PAYO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CNXN or PAYO more profitable?

PAYO runs the higher net margin — CNXN at 3.21% versus PAYO at 4.65%.

How have CNXN and PAYO total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CNXN delivered 16.94% and PAYO delivered -3.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) vs Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO)

A side-by-side comparison of PC Connection, Inc. and Payoneer Global Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CNXN

PC Connection, Inc.

$2.33B

$92.39TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PAYO

Payoneer Global Inc.

$2.42B

$7.15TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CNXN vs PAYO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

CNXN +126.8% (+14.6%/yr)PAYO -26.1% (-4.9%/yr)CNXN compounded faster over this window

CNXN PAYO

CNXN vs PAYO: by the numbers

•PAYO is the larger company ($2.42B vs $2.33B market cap).
•CNXN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.44 vs 52.04 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PAYO converts more revenue to profit (4.65% vs 3.21% net margin).
•PAYO grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.21% vs 2.28% CAGR).
•CNXN pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while PAYO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CNXN	PAYO
P/E ratio	24.44	52.04
Forward P/E	22.13	48.12
PEG ratio	2.70	N/A
P/S ratio	0.78	2.24
P/B ratio	2.45	3.70
EV / EBITDA	15.79	11.36
FCF yield	1.46%	5.46%

Profitability

Metric	CNXN	PAYO
Gross margin	18.89%	78.00%
Operating margin	4.22%	10.56%
Net margin	3.21%	4.65%
ROE	10.06%	7.69%
ROIC	9.49%	7.59%

Dividends

Metric	CNXN	PAYO
Dividend yield	0.81%	N/A
Payout ratio	19.84%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CNXN	PAYO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.28%	22.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.02%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	308.60%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.94%	-3.29%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CNXN or PAYO?: CNXN has the lower trailing P/E: CNXN trades at 24.44 and PAYO at 52.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CNXN or PAYO?: Over the past five years, PAYO grew revenue faster — CNXN at a 2.28% CAGR versus PAYO at 22.21%.
Does CNXN or PAYO pay a bigger dividend?: CNXN pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while PAYO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CNXN or PAYO more profitable?: PAYO runs the higher net margin — CNXN at 3.21% versus PAYO at 4.65%.
How have CNXN and PAYO total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CNXN delivered 16.94% and PAYO delivered -3.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CNXN analysis Full PAYO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

PC Connection P/E ratio Payoneer Global P/E ratio PC Connection dividend yield PC Connection ROE Payoneer Global ROE PC Connection operating margin Payoneer Global operating margin PC Connection revenue growth Payoneer Global revenue growth PC Connection free cash flow Payoneer Global free cash flow

PC Connection & Payoneer Global appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.