Which has the lower trailing P/E, CNXN or EEFT?

EEFT has the lower trailing P/E: CNXN trades at 24.38 and EEFT at 10.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CNXN or EEFT?

Over the past five years, EEFT grew revenue faster — CNXN at a 2.28% CAGR versus EEFT at 9.82%.

Does CNXN or EEFT pay a bigger dividend?

CNXN pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while EEFT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CNXN or EEFT more profitable?

EEFT runs the higher net margin — CNXN at 3.21% versus EEFT at 6.59%.

How have CNXN and EEFT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CNXN delivered 14.62% and EEFT delivered -2.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) vs Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT)

A side-by-side comparison of PC Connection, Inc. and Euronet Worldwide, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CNXN

PC Connection, Inc.

$2.33B

$92.17TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:19 PM EDT

EEFT

Euronet Worldwide, Inc.

$2.43B

$63.83TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:20 PM EDT

Total return — CNXN vs EEFT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CNXN +291.2% (+14.6%/yr)EEFT -23.2% (-2.6%/yr)CNXN compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CNXN EEFT

CNXN vs EEFT: by the numbers

•EEFT is the larger company ($2.43B vs $2.33B market cap).
•EEFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.02 vs 24.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EEFT converts more revenue to profit (6.59% vs 3.21% net margin).
•EEFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.82% vs 2.28% CAGR).
•CNXN pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while EEFT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CNXN	EEFT
P/E ratio	24.38	10.02
Forward P/E	22.08	5.96
PEG ratio	2.69	N/A
P/S ratio	0.78	0.56
P/B ratio	2.44	1.98
EV / EBITDA	15.75	3.11
FCF yield	1.46%	3.90%

Profitability

Metric	CNXN	EEFT
Gross margin	18.89%	33.76%
Operating margin	4.22%	11.55%
Net margin	3.21%	6.59%
ROE	10.06%	23.45%
ROIC	9.49%	7.57%

Dividends

Metric	CNXN	EEFT
Dividend yield	0.81%	N/A
Payout ratio	19.84%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CNXN	EEFT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.28%	9.82%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.02%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	21.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.94%	-13.46%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CNXN or EEFT?: EEFT has the lower trailing P/E: CNXN trades at 24.38 and EEFT at 10.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CNXN or EEFT?: Over the past five years, EEFT grew revenue faster — CNXN at a 2.28% CAGR versus EEFT at 9.82%.
Does CNXN or EEFT pay a bigger dividend?: CNXN pays a dividend (0.81% yield), while EEFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CNXN or EEFT more profitable?: EEFT runs the higher net margin — CNXN at 3.21% versus EEFT at 6.59%.
How have CNXN and EEFT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CNXN delivered 14.62% and EEFT delivered -2.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CNXN analysis Full EEFT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

PC Connection P/E ratio Euronet Worldwide P/E ratio PC Connection dividend yield PC Connection ROE Euronet Worldwide ROE PC Connection operating margin Euronet Worldwide operating margin PC Connection revenue growth Euronet Worldwide revenue growth PC Connection free cash flow Euronet Worldwide free cash flow

PC Connection & Euronet Worldwide appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.