Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) vs Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)
CNQ leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Exxon Mobil Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
$45.30Energy
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
$147.01Energy
Total return — CNQ vs XOM
growth of $100 · last 26yCNQ +2533.7%XOM +267.5%CNQ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CNQ XOM
CNQ vs XOM: by the numbers
- •XOM is the larger company ($609.33B vs $94.49B market cap).
- •CNQ trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.41 vs 24.79 P/E).
- •CNQ converts more revenue to profit (23.94% vs 7.76% net margin).
- •CNQ grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.46% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •CNQ pays the higher dividend yield (2.89% vs 2.78%).
Which is better, CNQ or XOM?
Metric tally: CNQ 14 · XOM 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCNQ(lower P/E)
GrowthCNQ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCNQ(higher dividend yield)
QualityCNQ(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CNQ | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.41● | 24.79 |
| Forward P/E | 9.16● | 14.15 |
| P/S ratio | 3.22 | 1.89● |
| P/B ratio | 4.12 | 2.42● |
| PEG ratio | 0.11● | 2.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.46● | 10.82 |
| FCF yield | 4.72%● | 3.06% |
Profitability
| Metric | CNQ | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.69%● | 25.49% |
| Operating margin | 26.74%● | 9.01% |
| Net margin | 23.94%● | 7.76% |
| ROE | 30.65%● | 9.95% |
| ROIC | 7.95%● | 6.34% |
Dividends
| Metric | CNQ | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.89%● | 2.78% |
| Payout ratio | 34.74% | 61.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CNQ | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.46%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.65%● | 12.08% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.93% | 36.20%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.57%● | 23.23% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CNQ or XOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: CNQ (lower P/E); growth: CNQ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CNQ (higher dividend yield); quality: CNQ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CNQ leads 14 to 3.
- Is CNQ or XOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CNQ is cheaper: CNQ trades at a 13.41 P/E and XOM at 24.79.
- Which has grown faster, CNQ or XOM?
- Over the past five years, CNQ grew revenue faster — CNQ at a 14.46% CAGR versus XOM at 12.49%.
- Does CNQ or XOM pay a bigger dividend?
- CNQ yields 2.89% and XOM yields 2.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CNQ or XOM more profitable?
- CNQ runs the higher net margin — CNQ at 23.94% versus XOM at 7.76%.
- Which has been the better investment, CNQ or XOM?
- Over the past 10-year, CNQ delivered the higher annualized total return — CNQ at 17.67% versus XOM at 9.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Canadian Natural Resources P/E ratioExxon Mobil P/E ratioCanadian Natural Resources dividend yieldExxon Mobil dividend yieldCanadian Natural Resources ROEExxon Mobil ROECanadian Natural Resources operating marginExxon Mobil operating marginCanadian Natural Resources revenue growthExxon Mobil revenue growthCanadian Natural Resources free cash flowExxon Mobil free cash flow
Canadian Natural Resources & Exxon Mobil appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.