Collective Mining Ltd. (CNL) vs Ferroglobe PLC (GSM)

A side-by-side comparison of Collective Mining Ltd. and Ferroglobe PLC across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CNL vs GSM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y
CNL +337.2% (+109.1%/yr)GSM -23.7% (-12.6%/yr)CNL compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001kStart $10020252026$437$76
CNL GSM

CNL vs GSM: by the numbers

  • •CNL is the larger company ($1.14B vs $828M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; CNL's is the smaller (0.00% vs -2.96% net margin).
  • •GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while CNL has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCNLGSM
P/S ratioN/A0.61
P/B ratio9.801.15

Profitability

MetricCNLGSM
Gross margin0.00%6.70%
Operating margin0.00%-9.00%
Net margin0.00%-2.96%
ROE-48.99%-5.63%
ROIC-36.72%-11.22%

Dividends

MetricCNLGSM
Dividend yieldN/A1.35%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCNLGSM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A0.06%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-12.07%

Frequently asked

Does CNL or GSM pay a bigger dividend?
GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while CNL has no payments in the available dividend history.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.