CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) vs Textron Inc. (TXT)
TXT leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CNH Industrial N.V. and Textron Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CNH vs TXT
growth of $100 · last 30yCNH -62.5%TXT +290.0%TXT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CNH TXT
CNH vs TXT: by the numbers
- •TXT is the larger company ($15.05B vs $12.82B market cap).
- •TXT trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.55 vs 32.39 P/E).
- •TXT converts more revenue to profit (6.15% vs 2.13% net margin).
- •TXT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.26% vs -6.01% CAGR).
- •CNH pays the higher dividend yield (1.00% vs 0.09%).
Which is better, CNH or TXT?
Metric tally: CNH 6 · TXT 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTXT(lower P/E)
GrowthTXT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCNH(higher dividend yield)
QualityTXT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CNH | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.39 | 16.55● |
| Forward P/E | 14.22 | 11.82● |
| P/S ratio | 0.69● | 1.00 |
| P/B ratio | 1.60● | 1.91 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.02 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.83 | 10.51● |
| FCF yield | 14.81%● | 4.64% |
Profitability
| Metric | CNH | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.38%● | 14.41% |
| Operating margin | 14.65%● | 8.37% |
| Net margin | 2.13% | 6.15%● |
| ROE | 4.97% | 11.67%● |
| ROIC | 5.27% | 7.33%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CNH | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.00%● | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | 24.39% | 1.57% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CNH | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -6.01% | 5.26%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -14.50% | 30.49%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -18.95% | 6.96%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -6.82% | 5.46%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CNH or TXT?
- It depends on your goal. value: TXT (lower P/E); growth: TXT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CNH (higher dividend yield); quality: TXT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TXT leads 10 to 6.
- Is CNH or TXT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TXT is cheaper: CNH trades at a 32.39 P/E and TXT at 16.55.
- Which has grown faster, CNH or TXT?
- Over the past five years, TXT grew revenue faster — CNH at a -6.01% CAGR versus TXT at 5.26%.
- Does CNH or TXT pay a bigger dividend?
- CNH yields 1.00% and TXT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CNH or TXT more profitable?
- TXT runs the higher net margin — CNH at 2.13% versus TXT at 6.15%.
- Which has been the better investment, CNH or TXT?
- Over the past 10-year, TXT delivered the higher annualized total return — CNH at 5.75% versus TXT at 9.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CNH Industrial P/E ratioTextron P/E ratioCNH Industrial dividend yieldTextron dividend yieldCNH Industrial ROETextron ROECNH Industrial operating marginTextron operating marginCNH Industrial revenue growthTextron revenue growthCNH Industrial free cash flowTextron free cash flow
CNH Industrial & Textron appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.