CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
CNH leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CNH Industrial N.V. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CNH
CNH Industrial N.V.
$10.60Industrials
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
$83.62Industrials
Total return — CNH vs SWK
growth of $100 · last 30yCNH -61.6%SWK +194.6%SWK compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CNH SWK
CNH vs SWK: by the numbers
- •CNH is the larger company ($13.14B vs $13.00B market cap).
- •SWK trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.27 vs 34.37 P/E).
- •SWK converts more revenue to profit (2.44% vs 2.13% net margin).
- •SWK grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.68% vs -6.01% CAGR).
- •SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.97% vs 0.94%).
Which is better, CNH or SWK?
Metric tally: CNH 9 · SWK 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSWK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSWK(higher dividend yield)
QualitySWK(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CNH | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.37 | 34.27 |
| Forward P/E | 15.09● | 15.62 |
| P/S ratio | 0.73● | 0.84 |
| P/B ratio | 1.70 | 1.42● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.11● | 15.04 |
| FCF yield | 13.95%● | 5.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | CNH | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.38%● | 30.03% |
| Operating margin | 14.65%● | 7.79% |
| Net margin | 2.13% | 2.44%● |
| ROE | 4.97%● | 4.13% |
| ROIC | 5.27% | 7.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CNH | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 3.97%● |
| Payout ratio | 24.39% | 125.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CNH | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -6.01% | 0.68%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -14.50%● | -19.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -18.95% | -17.64%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.39%● | -13.22% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CNH or SWK?
- It depends on your goal. growth: SWK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SWK (higher dividend yield); quality: SWK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CNH leads 9 to 6.
- Is CNH or SWK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: CNH trades at a 34.37 P/E and SWK at 34.27.
- Which has grown faster, CNH or SWK?
- Over the past five years, SWK grew revenue faster — CNH at a -6.01% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.
- Does CNH or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
- CNH yields 0.94% and SWK yields 3.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CNH or SWK more profitable?
- SWK runs the higher net margin — CNH at 2.13% versus SWK at 2.44%.
- Which has been the better investment, CNH or SWK?
- Over the past 10-year, CNH delivered the higher annualized total return — CNH at 5.50% versus SWK at -0.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CNH Industrial P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker P/E ratioCNH Industrial dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldCNH Industrial ROEStanley Black & Decker ROECNH Industrial operating marginStanley Black & Decker operating marginCNH Industrial revenue growthStanley Black & Decker revenue growthCNH Industrial free cash flowStanley Black & Decker free cash flow
CNH Industrial & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.