Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)
WM leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CMI vs WM
growth of $100 · last 30yCMI +6507.6%WM +664.5%CMI compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CMI WM
CMI vs WM: by the numbers
- •CMI is the larger company ($94.64B vs $90.57B market cap).
- •WM trades at the lower earnings multiple (32.64 vs 35.63 P/E).
- •WM converts more revenue to profit (10.99% vs 7.89% net margin).
- •CMI grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.78% vs 10.25% CAGR).
- •WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.68% vs 1.17%).
Which is better, CMI or WM?
Metric tally: CMI 6 · WM 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWM(lower P/E)
GrowthCMI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWM(higher dividend yield)
QualityCMI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CMI | WM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.63 | 32.64● |
| Forward P/E | 23.61● | 24.48 |
| P/S ratio | 2.81● | 3.59 |
| P/B ratio | 7.71● | 9.10 |
| PEG ratio | 3.15 | 2.39● |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.51 | 14.85● |
| FCF yield | 2.81% | 3.61%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CMI | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.39% | 32.06%● |
| Operating margin | 11.24% | 18.46%● |
| Net margin | 7.89% | 10.99%● |
| ROE | 21.64% | 27.88%● |
| ROIC | 11.41%● | 8.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | CMI | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 1.68%● |
| Payout ratio | 38.80% | 56.25% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CMI | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78%● | 10.25% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.31% | 13.68%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.25% | 7.28%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 26.19%● | 11.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CMI or WM?
- It depends on your goal. value: WM (lower P/E); growth: CMI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WM (higher dividend yield); quality: CMI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WM leads 11 to 6.
- Is CMI or WM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WM is cheaper: CMI trades at a 35.63 P/E and WM at 32.64.
- Which has grown faster, CMI or WM?
- Over the past five years, CMI grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
- Does CMI or WM pay a bigger dividend?
- CMI yields 1.17% and WM yields 1.68% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CMI or WM more profitable?
- WM runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus WM at 10.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, CMI or WM?
- Over the past 10-year, CMI delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 23.16% versus WM at 15.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cummins P/E ratioWaste Management P/E ratioCummins dividend yieldWaste Management dividend yieldCummins ROEWaste Management ROECummins operating marginWaste Management operating marginCummins revenue growthWaste Management revenue growthCummins free cash flowWaste Management free cash flow
Cummins & Waste Management appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.