Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCMI vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y
CMI +480.8%VRT +2679.9%VRT compounded faster
01k2k3k4kStart $1002020202220242026$581$2,780
CMI VRT

CMI vs VRT: by the numbers

  • VRT is the larger company ($104.87B vs $88.90B market cap).
  • CMI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.94 vs 61.63 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • VRT converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 7.82% net margin).
  • VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.93% vs 10.18% CAGR).
  • CMI pays the higher dividend yield (1.24% vs 0.08%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCMIVRT
P/E ratio32.9461.63
Forward P/E21.8340.66
P/S ratio2.579.32
P/B ratio6.9522.49
PEG ratio2.910.28
EV / EBITDA18.8742.29
FCF yield3.77%2.73%

Profitability

MetricCMIVRT
Gross margin25.32%37.52%
Operating margin11.13%19.12%
Net margin7.82%15.09%
ROE21.13%36.40%
ROIC11.41%18.55%

Dividends

MetricCMIVRT
Dividend yield1.24%0.08%
Payout ratio38.80%6.45%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCMIVRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)10.18%18.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)11.31%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)9.51%50.29%
Total return CAGR (5Y)25.88%58.58%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CMI or VRT?
CMI has the lower trailing P/E: CMI trades at 32.94 and VRT at 61.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CMI or VRT?
Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.18% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
Does CMI or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
CMI yields 1.24% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CMI or VRT more profitable?
VRT runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.82% versus VRT at 15.09%.
How have CMI and VRT total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, CMI delivered 20.86% and VRT delivered 58.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 8, 2026.