Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CMI
Cummins Inc.
$644.26IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
$272.40IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — CMI vs VRT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yCMI +480.8%VRT +2679.9%VRT compounded faster
CMI VRT
CMI vs VRT: by the numbers
- •VRT is the larger company ($104.87B vs $88.90B market cap).
- •CMI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.94 vs 61.63 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •VRT converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 7.82% net margin).
- •VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.93% vs 10.18% CAGR).
- •CMI pays the higher dividend yield (1.24% vs 0.08%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CMI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.94 | 61.63 |
| Forward P/E | 21.83 | 40.66 |
| P/S ratio | 2.57 | 9.32 |
| P/B ratio | 6.95 | 22.49 |
| PEG ratio | 2.91 | 0.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.87 | 42.29 |
| FCF yield | 3.77% | 2.73% |
Profitability
| Metric | CMI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.32% | 37.52% |
| Operating margin | 11.13% | 19.12% |
| Net margin | 7.82% | 15.09% |
| ROE | 21.13% | 36.40% |
| ROIC | 11.41% | 18.55% |
Dividends
| Metric | CMI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 0.08% |
| Payout ratio | 38.80% | 6.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CMI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.18% | 18.93% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.31% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.51% | 50.29% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.88% | 58.58% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CMI or VRT?
- CMI has the lower trailing P/E: CMI trades at 32.94 and VRT at 61.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CMI or VRT?
- Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.18% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
- Does CMI or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- CMI yields 1.24% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CMI or VRT more profitable?
- VRT runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.82% versus VRT at 15.09%.
- How have CMI and VRT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CMI delivered 20.86% and VRT delivered 58.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cummins P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioCummins dividend yieldVertiv dividend yieldCummins ROEVertiv ROECummins operating marginVertiv operating marginCummins revenue growthVertiv revenue growthCummins free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Cummins & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 8, 2026.