Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
VRT leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though CMI is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CMI vs VRT
growth of $100 · last 8yCMI +409.5%VRT +3131.7%VRT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CMI VRT
CMI vs VRT: by the numbers
- •VRT is the larger company ($120.63B vs $96.46B market cap).
- •CMI trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.31 vs 79.98 P/E).
- •VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 7.89% net margin).
- •VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 10.78% CAGR).
- •CMI pays the higher dividend yield (1.14% vs 0.07%).
Which is better, CMI or VRT?
Metric tally: CMI 7 · VRT 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCMI(lower P/E)
GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCMI(higher dividend yield)
QualityVRT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CMI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.31● | 79.98 |
| Forward P/E | 24.06● | 36.20 |
| P/S ratio | 2.86● | 11.51 |
| P/B ratio | 7.86● | 29.41 |
| PEG ratio | 3.21 | 0.28● |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.16● | 54.09 |
| FCF yield | 2.75%● | 1.85% |
Profitability
| Metric | CMI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.39% | 36.16%● |
| Operating margin | 11.24% | 18.54%● |
| Net margin | 7.89% | 14.37%● |
| ROE | 21.64% | 36.71%● |
| ROIC | 11.41% | 18.55%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CMI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.14%● | 0.07% |
| Payout ratio | 38.80% | 6.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CMI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78% | 18.86%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.31% | 79.41%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.25% | 41.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 26.99% | 63.23%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CMI or VRT?
- It depends on your goal. value: CMI (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CMI (higher dividend yield); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VRT leads 10 to 7.
- Is CMI or VRT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CMI is cheaper: CMI trades at a 36.31 P/E and VRT at 79.98.
- Which has grown faster, CMI or VRT?
- Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
- Does CMI or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- CMI yields 1.14% and VRT yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CMI or VRT more profitable?
- VRT runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus VRT at 14.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, CMI or VRT?
- Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 22.50% versus VRT at 63.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cummins P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioCummins dividend yieldVertiv dividend yieldCummins ROEVertiv ROECummins operating marginVertiv operating marginCummins revenue growthVertiv revenue growthCummins free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Cummins & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.