Is CMI or TT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CMI is cheaper: CMI trades at a 36.31 P/E and TT at 36.69.

Which has grown faster, CMI or TT?

Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.

Does CMI or TT pay a bigger dividend?

CMI yields 1.14% and TT yields 0.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CMI or TT more profitable?

TT runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus TT at 13.42%.

Which has been the better investment, CMI or TT?

Over the past 10-year, TT delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 22.50% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

TT leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Trane Technologies plc

$104.86B

$474.34Industrials

Total return — CMI vs TT

growth of $100 · last 30y

CMI +6700.1%TT +4079.2%CMI compounded faster

CMI TT

CMI vs TT: by the numbers

•TT is the larger company ($104.86B vs $96.46B market cap).
•CMI trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.31 vs 36.69 P/E).
•TT converts more revenue to profit (13.42% vs 7.89% net margin).
•TT grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.98% vs 10.78% CAGR).
•CMI pays the higher dividend yield (1.14% vs 0.84%).

Which is better, CMI or TT?

Metric tally: CMI 6 · TT 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

IncomeCMI(higher dividend yield)

QualityTT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CMI	TT
P/E ratio	36.31	36.69
Forward P/E	24.06●	27.87
P/S ratio	2.86●	4.90
P/B ratio	7.86●	12.29
PEG ratio	3.21	2.06●
EV / EBITDA	20.16●	25.64
FCF yield	2.75%	2.99%●

Profitability

Metric	CMI	TT
Gross margin	25.39%	35.92%●
Operating margin	11.24%	18.17%●
Net margin	7.89%	13.42%●
ROE	21.64%	33.65%●
ROIC	11.41%	20.26%●

Dividends

Metric	CMI	TT
Dividend yield	1.14%●	0.84%
Payout ratio	38.80%	30.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CMI	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.78%	10.98%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.31%	29.75%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.25%	11.10%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.99%●	22.96%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CMI or TT?: It depends on your goal. income: CMI (higher dividend yield); quality: TT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TT leads 9 to 6.
Is CMI or TT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CMI is cheaper: CMI trades at a 36.31 P/E and TT at 36.69.
Which has grown faster, CMI or TT?: Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.
Does CMI or TT pay a bigger dividend?: CMI yields 1.14% and TT yields 0.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CMI or TT more profitable?: TT runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus TT at 13.42%.
Which has been the better investment, CMI or TT?: Over the past 10-year, TT delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 22.50% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CMI analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cummins P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Cummins dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Cummins ROE Trane Technologies ROE Cummins operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Cummins revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Cummins free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Cummins & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.