Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)
CMI leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CMI vs PWR
growth of $100 · last 28yCMI +5027.8%PWR +9263.3%PWR compounded faster
CMI PWR
CMI vs PWR: by the numbers
- •PWR is the larger company ($105.38B vs $98.92B market cap).
- •CMI trades at the lower earnings multiple (37.24 vs 96.33 P/E).
- •CMI converts more revenue to profit (7.89% vs 3.72% net margin).
- •PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.91% vs 10.78% CAGR).
- •CMI pays the higher dividend yield (1.12% vs 0.06%).
Which is better, CMI or PWR?
Metric tally: CMI 13 · PWR 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCMI(lower P/E)
GrowthPWR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCMI(higher dividend yield)
QualityCMI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CMI | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.24● | 96.33 |
| Forward P/E | 24.68● | 42.86 |
| P/S ratio | 2.94● | 3.56 |
| P/B ratio | 8.06● | 11.81 |
| PEG ratio | 3.29● | 5.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.65● | 46.89 |
| FCF yield | 2.68%● | 1.57% |
Profitability
| Metric | CMI | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.39%● | 13.59% |
| Operating margin | 11.24%● | 5.76% |
| Net margin | 7.89%● | 3.72% |
| ROE | 21.64%● | 12.33% |
| ROIC | 11.41%● | 7.07% |
Dividends
| Metric | CMI | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.12%● | 0.06% |
| Payout ratio | 38.80% | 6.11% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CMI | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78% | 21.91%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.31% | 16.88%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.25% | 17.91%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.17% | 52.49%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CMI or PWR?
- It depends on your goal. value: CMI (lower P/E); growth: PWR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CMI (higher dividend yield); quality: CMI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CMI leads 13 to 4.
- Is CMI or PWR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CMI is cheaper: CMI trades at a 37.24 P/E and PWR at 96.33.
- Which has grown faster, CMI or PWR?
- Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus PWR at 21.91%.
- Does CMI or PWR pay a bigger dividend?
- CMI yields 1.12% and PWR yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CMI or PWR more profitable?
- CMI runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus PWR at 3.72%.
- Which has been the better investment, CMI or PWR?
- Over the past 10-year, PWR delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 23.31% versus PWR at 40.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cummins P/E ratioQuanta Services P/E ratioCummins dividend yieldQuanta Services dividend yieldCummins ROEQuanta Services ROECummins operating marginQuanta Services operating marginCummins revenue growthQuanta Services revenue growthCummins free cash flowQuanta Services free cash flow
Cummins & Quanta Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.