Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs General Dynamics Corporation (GD)
GD leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and General Dynamics Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CMI vs GD
growth of $100 · last 30yCMI +6492.7%GD +2219.5%CMI compounded faster
CMI GD
CMI vs GD: by the numbers
- •GD is the larger company ($97.23B vs $93.79B market cap).
- •GD trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.61 vs 35.31 P/E).
- •GD converts more revenue to profit (8.07% vs 7.89% net margin).
- •CMI grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.78% vs 6.89% CAGR).
- •GD pays the higher dividend yield (1.69% vs 1.18%).
Which is better, CMI or GD?
Metric tally: CMI 7 · GD 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGD(lower P/E)
GrowthCMI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGD(higher dividend yield)
QualityCMI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CMI | GD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.31 | 22.61● |
| Forward P/E | 23.40 | 19.73● |
| P/S ratio | 2.78 | 1.83● |
| P/B ratio | 7.64 | 3.78● |
| PEG ratio | 3.12 | 1.63● |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.78 | 16.32● |
| FCF yield | 2.83% | 6.29%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CMI | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.39%● | 15.24% |
| Operating margin | 11.24%● | 10.24% |
| Net margin | 7.89% | 8.07%● |
| ROE | 21.64%● | 16.65% |
| ROIC | 11.41%● | 10.58% |
Dividends
| Metric | CMI | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.18% | 1.69%● |
| Payout ratio | 38.80% | 38.94% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CMI | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78%● | 6.89% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.31%● | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.25% | 11.42%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.03%● | 15.76% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CMI or GD?
- It depends on your goal. value: GD (lower P/E); growth: CMI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GD (higher dividend yield); quality: CMI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GD leads 10 to 7.
- Is CMI or GD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GD is cheaper: CMI trades at a 35.31 P/E and GD at 22.61.
- Which has grown faster, CMI or GD?
- Over the past five years, CMI grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus GD at 6.89%.
- Does CMI or GD pay a bigger dividend?
- CMI yields 1.18% and GD yields 1.69% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CMI or GD more profitable?
- GD runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus GD at 8.07%.
- Which has been the better investment, CMI or GD?
- Over the past 10-year, CMI delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 22.74% versus GD at 12.29%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cummins P/E ratioGeneral Dynamics P/E ratioCummins dividend yieldGeneral Dynamics dividend yieldCummins ROEGeneral Dynamics ROECummins operating marginGeneral Dynamics operating marginCummins revenue growthGeneral Dynamics revenue growthCummins free cash flowGeneral Dynamics free cash flow
Cummins & General Dynamics appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.