Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)

A side-by-side comparison of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Verisk Analytics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: CMG is classified in Consumer Cyclical; VRSK is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCMG vs VRSK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 17y
CMG +1637.2%VRSK +698.7%CMG compounded faster
01k2k3kStart $10020122015201820212024$1,737$799
CMG VRSK

CMG vs VRSK: by the numbers

  • CMG is the larger company ($43.01B vs $27.81B market cap).
  • CMG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.46 vs 31.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • VRSK converts more revenue to profit (29.34% vs 11.96% net margin).
  • CMG grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.96% vs 1.92% CAGR).
  • VRSK pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while CMG has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCMGVRSK
P/E ratio30.4631.46
Forward P/E29.2826.96
P/S ratio3.569.01
P/B ratio17.9592.99
PEG ratio12.013.81
EV / EBITDA21.0818.83
FCF yield3.49%4.03%

Profitability

MetricCMGVRSK
Gross margin25.38%67.44%
Operating margin15.79%44.87%
Net margin11.96%29.34%
ROE60.31%293.95%
ROIC18.97%19.56%

Dividends

MetricCMGVRSK
Dividend yieldN/A0.92%
Payout ratioN/A29.19%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCMGVRSK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)13.96%1.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)35.70%8.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)30.02%4.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-1.68%2.75%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CMG or VRSK?
CMG has the lower trailing P/E: CMG trades at 30.46 and VRSK at 31.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CMG or VRSK?
Over the past five years, CMG grew revenue faster — CMG at a 13.96% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.
Does CMG or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?
VRSK pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while CMG has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CMG or VRSK more profitable?
VRSK runs the higher net margin — CMG at 11.96% versus VRSK at 29.34%.
How have CMG and VRSK total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CMG delivered 14.51% and VRSK delivered 9.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.