Which has the lower trailing P/E, CMCSA or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: CMCSA trades at 7.38 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CMCSA or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — CMCSA at a 2.76% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Does CMCSA or NA pay a bigger dividend?

CMCSA pays a dividend (5.79% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CMCSA or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — CMCSA at 8.97% versus NA at 505.49%.

Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of Comcast Corporation and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CMCSA is classified in Communication Services; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CMCSA

Comcast Corporation

$85.84B

$24.19Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CMCSA vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

CMCSA -34.4%NA -98.4%CMCSA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CMCSA NA

CMCSA vs NA: by the numbers

•CMCSA is the larger company ($85.84B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 7.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 8.97% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 2.76% CAGR).
•CMCSA pays a dividend (5.79% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CMCSA	NA
P/E ratio	7.38	2.30
Forward P/E	6.52	N/A
P/S ratio	0.65	11.40
P/B ratio	0.91	0.41
PEG ratio	0.17	N/A
EV / EBITDA	2.34	6.44
FCF yield	25.13%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CMCSA	NA
Gross margin	69.39%	-147.33%
Operating margin	14.66%	-396.84%
Net margin	8.97%	505.49%
ROE	12.48%	17.96%
ROIC	6.42%	-10.96%

Dividends

Metric	CMCSA	NA
Dividend yield	5.79%	N/A
Payout ratio	24.40%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CMCSA	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.76%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.66%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.05%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-14.56%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CMCSA or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: CMCSA trades at 7.38 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CMCSA or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — CMCSA at a 2.76% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Does CMCSA or NA pay a bigger dividend?: CMCSA pays a dividend (5.79% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CMCSA or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — CMCSA at 8.97% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full CMCSA analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Comcast P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio Comcast dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield Comcast ROE Nano Labs ROE Comcast operating margin Nano Labs operating margin Comcast revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth Comcast free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

Comcast & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.