Which has grown faster, CMCO or TATT?

Over the past five years, TATT grew revenue faster — CMCO at a 15.51% CAGR versus TATT at 20.59%.

Does CMCO or TATT pay a bigger dividend?

CMCO pays a dividend (1.65% yield), while TATT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CMCO or TATT more profitable?

TATT runs the higher net margin — CMCO at -21.25% versus TATT at 11.26%.

How have CMCO and TATT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CMCO delivered 0.14% and TATT delivered 15.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) vs TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT)

A side-by-side comparison of Columbus McKinnon Corporation and TAT Technologies Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CMCO

Columbus McKinnon Corporation

$491M

$17.02IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TATT

TAT Technologies Ltd.

$435M

$33.49IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CMCO vs TATT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CMCO +2.6% (+0.3%/yr)TATT +354.0% (+16.3%/yr)TATT compounded faster over this window

CMCO TATT

CMCO vs TATT: by the numbers

•CMCO is the larger company ($491M vs $435M market cap).
•TATT is profitable (11.26% net margin) while CMCO runs a net loss (-21.25%).
•TATT grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.59% vs 15.51% CAGR).
•CMCO pays a dividend (1.65% yield), while TATT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CMCO	TATT
P/E ratio	N/A	20.93
Forward P/E	8.45	20.05
P/S ratio	0.33	2.33
P/B ratio	0.87	2.30
EV / EBITDA	38.38	16.76
FCF yield	N/A	1.62%

Profitability

Metric	CMCO	TATT
Gross margin	28.78%	24.98%
Operating margin	-3.08%	9.85%
Net margin	-21.25%	11.26%
ROE	-23.14%	11.14%
ROIC	-1.07%	7.53%

Dividends

Metric	CMCO	TATT
Dividend yield	1.65%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CMCO	TATT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.51%	20.59%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.54%	39.35%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CMCO or TATT?: Over the past five years, TATT grew revenue faster — CMCO at a 15.51% CAGR versus TATT at 20.59%.
Does CMCO or TATT pay a bigger dividend?: CMCO pays a dividend (1.65% yield), while TATT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CMCO or TATT more profitable?: TATT runs the higher net margin — CMCO at -21.25% versus TATT at 11.26%.
How have CMCO and TATT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CMCO delivered 0.14% and TATT delivered 15.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CMCO analysis Full TATT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

TAT Technologies P/E ratio Columbus McKinnon dividend yield Columbus McKinnon ROE TAT Technologies ROE Columbus McKinnon operating margin TAT Technologies operating margin Columbus McKinnon revenue growth TAT Technologies revenue growth Columbus McKinnon free cash flow TAT Technologies free cash flow

Columbus McKinnon & TAT Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.