Climb Bio, Inc. (CLYM) vs Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. (ZVRA)

A side-by-side comparison of Climb Bio, Inc. and Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CLYM vs ZVRA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y
CLYM +41.1% (+18.8%/yr)ZVRA +46.2% (+20.9%/yr)ZVRA compounded faster over this window
050100150200Start $10020252026$141$146
CLYM ZVRA

CLYM vs ZVRA: by the numbers

  • •ZVRA is the larger company ($634M vs $612M market cap).
  • •ZVRA is profitable (42.82% net margin) while CLYM runs a net loss (0.00%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCLYMZVRA
P/E ratioN/A11.53
Forward P/EN/A9.68
P/S ratioN/A4.66
P/B ratio2.552.91
EV / EBITDAN/A12.11
FCF yieldN/A5.13%

Profitability

MetricCLYMZVRA
Gross margin0.00%84.52%
Operating margin0.00%-3.98%
Net margin0.00%42.82%
ROE-24.06%26.77%
ROIC-26.94%12.93%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCLYMZVRA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A36.81%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A3.75%

Frequently asked

Is CLYM or ZVRA more profitable?
ZVRA runs the higher net margin — CLYM at 0.00% versus ZVRA at 42.82%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.