The Clorox Company (CLX) vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC)
CLX and MKC are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of The Clorox Company and McCormick & Company, Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CLX
The Clorox Company
$96.82Consumer Defensive
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.95Consumer Defensive
Total return — CLX vs MKC
growth of $100 · last 30yCLX +373.7%MKC +780.4%MKC compounded faster
CLX MKC
CLX vs MKC: by the numbers
- •MKC is the larger company ($13.16B vs $11.71B market cap).
- •MKC trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.02 vs 15.72 P/E).
- •MKC converts more revenue to profit (23.12% vs 11.18% net margin).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs -2.11% CAGR).
- •CLX pays the higher dividend yield (5.12% vs 3.80%).
Which is better, CLX or MKC?
Metric tally: CLX 8 · MKC 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMKC(lower P/E)
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCLX(higher dividend yield)
QualityCLX(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CLX | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.72 | 8.02● |
| Forward P/E | 15.57 | 14.75● |
| P/S ratio | 1.74● | 1.86 |
| P/B ratio | 37.26 | 1.89● |
| PEG ratio | 0.10● | 8.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.51● | 14.63 |
| FCF yield | 3.22% | 6.45%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CLX | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 43.85%● | 37.94% |
| Operating margin | 15.68% | 15.51% |
| Net margin | 11.18% | 23.12%● |
| ROE | 252.34%● | 23.54% |
| ROIC | 24.10%● | 7.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLX | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.12%● | 3.80% |
| Payout ratio | 75.61% | 63.27% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLX | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.11% | 3.90%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.54% | 0.98%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.87% | 3.15%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.20%● | -9.28% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CLX or MKC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MKC (lower P/E); growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CLX (higher dividend yield); quality: CLX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is CLX or MKC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MKC is cheaper: CLX trades at a 15.72 P/E and MKC at 8.02.
- Which has grown faster, CLX or MKC?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — CLX at a -2.11% CAGR versus MKC at 3.90%.
- Does CLX or MKC pay a bigger dividend?
- CLX yields 5.12% and MKC yields 3.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CLX or MKC more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — CLX at 11.18% versus MKC at 23.12%.
- Which has been the better investment, CLX or MKC?
- Over the past 10-year, MKC delivered the higher annualized total return — CLX at -0.13% versus MKC at 1.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Clorox P/E ratioMcCormick & P/E ratioClorox dividend yieldMcCormick & dividend yieldClorox ROEMcCormick & ROEClorox operating marginMcCormick & operating marginClorox revenue growthMcCormick & revenue growthClorox free cash flowMcCormick & free cash flow
Clorox & McCormick & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.