The Clorox Company (CLX) vs Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW)
CLX leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Clorox Company and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CLX
The Clorox Company
$95.80Consumer Defensive
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$45.06Consumer Defensive
Total return — CLX vs LW
growth of $100 · last 10yCLX -19.8%LW +32.5%LW compounded faster
CLX LW
CLX vs LW: by the numbers
- •CLX is the larger company ($11.58B vs $6.22B market cap).
- •CLX trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.55 vs 21.06 P/E).
- •CLX converts more revenue to profit (11.18% vs 4.61% net margin).
- •LW grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.30% vs -2.11% CAGR).
- •CLX pays the higher dividend yield (5.18% vs 3.33%).
Which is better, CLX or LW?
Metric tally: CLX 9 · LW 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCLX(lower P/E)
GrowthLW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCLX(higher dividend yield)
QualityCLX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLX | LW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.55● | 21.06 |
| Forward P/E | 15.41 | 15.44 |
| P/S ratio | 1.73 | 0.96● |
| P/B ratio | 36.87 | 3.44● |
| PEG ratio | 0.10 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.42 | 10.28● |
| FCF yield | 3.26% | 10.10%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CLX | LW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 43.85%● | 20.57% |
| Operating margin | 15.68%● | 9.33% |
| Net margin | 11.18%● | 4.61% |
| ROE | 252.34%● | 16.44% |
| ROIC | 24.10%● | 7.43% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLX | LW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.18%● | 3.33% |
| Payout ratio | 75.61% | 59.76% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLX | LW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.11% | 12.30%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.54%● | -3.93% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.87% | 7.92%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.06%● | -8.68% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CLX or LW?
- It depends on your goal. value: CLX (lower P/E); growth: LW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CLX (higher dividend yield); quality: CLX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CLX leads 9 to 6.
- Is CLX or LW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CLX is cheaper: CLX trades at a 15.55 P/E and LW at 21.06.
- Which has grown faster, CLX or LW?
- Over the past five years, LW grew revenue faster — CLX at a -2.11% CAGR versus LW at 12.30%.
- Does CLX or LW pay a bigger dividend?
- CLX yields 5.18% and LW yields 3.33% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CLX or LW more profitable?
- CLX runs the higher net margin — CLX at 11.18% versus LW at 4.61%.
- Which has been the better investment, CLX or LW?
- Over the past 5-year, CLX delivered the higher annualized total return — CLX at -0.28% versus LW at -8.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Clorox P/E ratioLamb Weston P/E ratioClorox dividend yieldLamb Weston dividend yieldClorox ROELamb Weston ROEClorox operating marginLamb Weston operating marginClorox revenue growthLamb Weston revenue growthClorox free cash flowLamb Weston free cash flow
Clorox & Lamb Weston appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.