Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or ZM?

ZM has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 31.29 and ZM at 15.80. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or ZM?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.

Is CLS or ZM more profitable?

ZM runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus ZM at 41.99%.

How have CLS and ZM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 39.47% and ZM delivered -20.22% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$34.65B

$301.36TechnologyAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Zoom Communications, Inc.

$31.51B

$107.47TechnologyAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — CLS vs ZM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

CLS +3293.7% (+65.5%/yr)ZM +73.3% (+8.2%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CLS ZM

CLS vs ZM: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($34.65B vs $31.51B market cap).
•ZM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.80 vs 31.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ZM converts more revenue to profit (41.99% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 8.51% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	ZM
P/E ratio	31.29	15.80
Forward P/E	26.50	18.01
P/S ratio	2.24	6.54
P/B ratio	14.12	3.24
EV / EBITDA	24.41	23.45
FCF yield	1.48%	6.08%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	ZM
Gross margin	11.59%	77.40%
Operating margin	8.13%	24.17%
Net margin	7.16%	41.99%
ROE	45.07%	20.77%
ROIC	29.75%	9.24%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	ZM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	8.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	21.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	4.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	103.26%	-20.22%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or ZM?: ZM has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 31.29 and ZM at 15.80. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or ZM?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.
Is CLS or ZM more profitable?: ZM runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus ZM at 41.99%.
How have CLS and ZM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 39.47% and ZM delivered -20.22% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full ZM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Zoom Communications P/E ratio Celestica ROE Zoom Communications ROE Celestica operating margin Zoom Communications operating margin Celestica revenue growth Zoom Communications revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Zoom Communications free cash flow

Celestica & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.