Is CLS or XYZ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and XYZ at 58.42.

Which has grown faster, CLS or XYZ?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus XYZ at 13.19%.

Is CLS or XYZ more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus XYZ at 3.30%.

Which has been the better investment, CLS or XYZ?

Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 43.02% versus XYZ at 23.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Block, Inc. (XYZ)

CLS and XYZ are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Block, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CLS vs XYZ

growth of $100 · last 11y

CLS +3250.3%XYZ +472.1%CLS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CLS XYZ

CLS vs XYZ: by the numbers

•XYZ is the larger company ($44.51B vs $42.83B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower earnings multiple (44.99 vs 58.42 P/E).
•CLS converts more revenue to profit (6.95% vs 3.30% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 13.19% CAGR).

Which is better, CLS or XYZ?

Metric tally: CLS 8 · XYZ 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCLS(lower P/E)

GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	XYZ
P/E ratio	44.99●	58.42
Forward P/E	37.36	14.74●
P/S ratio	3.12	1.83●
P/B ratio	21.04	2.06●
PEG ratio	0.39●	1.68
EV / EBITDA	31.98	24.82●
FCF yield	1.14%	7.29%●

Profitability

Metric	CLS	XYZ
Gross margin	11.61%	44.85%●
Operating margin	7.84%	11.74%●
Net margin	6.95%●	3.30%
ROE	46.86%●	3.72%
ROIC	27.74%●	7.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	XYZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.51%●	13.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%●	34.72%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.52%	64.00%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	116.87%●	-20.61%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CLS or XYZ?: It depends on your goal. value: CLS (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is CLS or XYZ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and XYZ at 58.42.
Which has grown faster, CLS or XYZ?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus XYZ at 13.19%.
Is CLS or XYZ more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus XYZ at 3.30%.
Which has been the better investment, CLS or XYZ?: Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 43.02% versus XYZ at 23.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full XYZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Block P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Block dividend yield Celestica ROE Block ROE Celestica operating margin Block operating margin Celestica revenue growth Block revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Block free cash flow

Celestica & Block appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.