Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or XYZ?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 38.79 and XYZ at 137.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or XYZ?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus XYZ at 9.47%.

Is CLS or XYZ more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus XYZ at 1.43%.

How have CLS and XYZ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 41.66% and XYZ delivered 21.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Block, Inc. (XYZ)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Block, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$42.95B

$373.56TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

XYZ

Block, Inc.

$45.67B

$76.74TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs XYZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2732.2% (+39.7%/yr)XYZ +607.0% (+21.6%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

CLS XYZ

CLS vs XYZ: by the numbers

•XYZ is the larger company ($45.67B vs $42.95B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (38.79 vs 137.04 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 1.43% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 9.47% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	XYZ
P/E ratio	38.79	137.04
Forward P/E	32.92	N/A
P/S ratio	2.75	1.82
P/B ratio	17.32	2.08
EV / EBITDA	29.90	15.18
FCF yield	1.21%	10.55%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	XYZ
Gross margin	11.59%	46.36%
Operating margin	8.13%	10.15%
Net margin	7.16%	1.43%
ROE	45.07%	1.62%
ROIC	29.75%	4.78%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	XYZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	9.47%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	34.72%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	59.89%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	108.65%	-20.60%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or XYZ?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 38.79 and XYZ at 137.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or XYZ?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus XYZ at 9.47%.
Is CLS or XYZ more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus XYZ at 1.43%.
How have CLS and XYZ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 41.66% and XYZ delivered 21.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full XYZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Block P/E ratio Celestica ROE Block ROE Celestica operating margin Block operating margin Celestica revenue growth Block revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Block free cash flow

Celestica & Block appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.