Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Weatherford International plc (WFRD)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Weatherford International plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; WFRD is classified in Energy. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
$83.58EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs WFRD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yCLS +4036.1%WFRD +258.7%CLS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS WFRD
CLS vs WFRD: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($40.26B vs $5.99B market cap).
- •WFRD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.95 vs 33.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •WFRD converts more revenue to profit (7.66% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 7.14% CAGR).
- •WFRD pays a dividend (1.22% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 16.95 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 15.93 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 1.30 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 3.47 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 10.80 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 9.14% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 21.70% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 12.70% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 7.66% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 20.46% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 16.68% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.22% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 17.62% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 7.14% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 28.16% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 39.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or WFRD?
- WFRD has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and WFRD at 16.95. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or WFRD?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus WFRD at 7.14%.
- Does CLS or WFRD pay a bigger dividend?
- WFRD pays a dividend (1.22% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or WFRD more profitable?
- WFRD runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus WFRD at 7.66%.
- How have CLS and WFRD total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and WFRD delivered 39.21% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioWeatherford International P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldWeatherford International dividend yieldCelestica ROEWeatherford International ROECelestica operating marginWeatherford International operating marginCelestica revenue growthWeatherford International revenue growthCelestica free cash flowWeatherford International free cash flow
Celestica & Weatherford International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.