Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Weatherford International plc (WFRD)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Weatherford International plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; WFRD is classified in Energy. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
$88.85EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs WFRD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yCLS +3822.0% (+68.9%/yr)WFRD +291.7% (+21.5%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS WFRD
CLS vs WFRD: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $6.37B market cap).
- •WFRD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.52 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •WFRD converts more revenue to profit (7.66% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 7.14% CAGR).
- •WFRD pays a dividend (1.16% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 17.52 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 17.75 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 1.33 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 3.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 7.59 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 8.24% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 21.70% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 12.70% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 7.66% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 20.46% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 13.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.16% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 21.20% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 7.14% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 26.21% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 41.69% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or WFRD?
- WFRD has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and WFRD at 17.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or WFRD?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus WFRD at 7.14%.
- Does CLS or WFRD pay a bigger dividend?
- WFRD pays a dividend (1.16% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or WFRD more profitable?
- WFRD runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus WFRD at 7.66%.
- How have CLS and WFRD total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 106.10% and WFRD delivered 41.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioWeatherford International P/E ratioWeatherford International dividend yieldCelestica ROEWeatherford International ROECelestica operating marginWeatherford International operating marginCelestica revenue growthWeatherford International revenue growthCelestica free cash flowWeatherford International free cash flow
Celestica & Weatherford International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.