Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or WDC?

WDC has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and WDC at 18.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or WDC?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus WDC at -5.25%.

Does CLS or WDC pay a bigger dividend?

WDC pays a dividend (0.10% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or WDC more profitable?

WDC runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus WDC at 72.95%.

How have CLS and WDC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and WDC delivered 30.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Western Digital Corporation (WDC)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Western Digital Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WDC

Western Digital Corporation

$154.13B

$447.18TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs WDC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2914.0% (+40.6%/yr)WDC +1262.7% (+29.8%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

CLS WDC

CLS vs WDC: by the numbers

•WDC is the larger company ($154.13B vs $39.85B market cap).
•WDC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.02 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WDC converts more revenue to profit (72.95% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs -5.25% CAGR).
•WDC pays a dividend (0.10% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	WDC
P/E ratio	35.99	18.02
Forward P/E	30.38	22.00
P/S ratio	2.55	11.93
P/B ratio	16.07	17.39
EV / EBITDA	27.75	31.46
FCF yield	1.30%	2.09%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	WDC
Gross margin	11.59%	48.85%
Operating margin	8.13%	34.89%
Net margin	7.16%	72.95%
ROE	45.07%	106.32%
ROIC	29.75%	40.19%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	WDC
Dividend yield	N/A	0.10%
Payout ratio	N/A	2.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	WDC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	-5.25%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	58.48%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	29.14%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	106.10%	61.31%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or WDC?: WDC has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and WDC at 18.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or WDC?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus WDC at -5.25%.
Does CLS or WDC pay a bigger dividend?: WDC pays a dividend (0.10% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or WDC more profitable?: WDC runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus WDC at 72.95%.
How have CLS and WDC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and WDC delivered 30.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full WDC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Western Digital P/E ratio Western Digital dividend yield Celestica ROE Western Digital ROE Celestica operating margin Western Digital operating margin Celestica revenue growth Western Digital revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Western Digital free cash flow

Celestica & Western Digital appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.