Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Vistra Corp. (VST)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Vistra Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; VST is classified in Utilities. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
VST
Vistra Corp.
$148.38UtilitiesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs VST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +2823.0% (+40.1%/yr)VST +1043.3% (+27.6%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS VST
CLS vs VST: by the numbers
- •VST is the larger company ($50.03B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •VST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.98 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •VST converts more revenue to profit (13.89% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 6.24% CAGR).
- •VST pays a dividend (0.60% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | VST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 24.98 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 17.23 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 3.13 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 9.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 22.40 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 2.75% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 12.97% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 2.34% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 13.89% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 40.48% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 0.87% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.60% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 15.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 6.24% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 11.20% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | -42.65% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 54.37% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or VST?
- VST has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and VST at 24.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or VST?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus VST at 6.24%.
- Does CLS or VST pay a bigger dividend?
- VST pays a dividend (0.60% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or VST more profitable?
- VST runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus VST at 13.89%.
- How have CLS and VST total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 106.10% and VST delivered 54.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioVistra P/E ratioVistra dividend yieldCelestica ROEVistra ROECelestica operating marginVistra operating marginCelestica revenue growthVistra revenue growthCelestica free cash flowVistra free cash flow
Celestica & Vistra appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.