Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or VST?

VST has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and VST at 26.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or VST?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus VST at 6.97%.

Does CLS or VST pay a bigger dividend?

VST pays a dividend (0.58% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or VST more profitable?

VST runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus VST at 13.82%.

How have CLS and VST total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and VST delivered 53.22% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Vistra Corp. (VST)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Vistra Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; VST is classified in Utilities. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$40.26B

$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

VST

Vistra Corp.

$50.12B

$148.64UtilitiesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs VST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2982.5%VST +1034.8%CLS compounded faster

CLS VST

CLS vs VST: by the numbers

•VST is the larger company ($50.12B vs $40.26B market cap).
•VST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.14 vs 33.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VST converts more revenue to profit (13.82% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 6.97% CAGR).
•VST pays a dividend (0.58% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	VST
P/E ratio	33.05	26.14
Forward P/E	31.47	17.06
P/S ratio	2.37	3.29
P/B ratio	14.91	9.54
PEG ratio	0.39	2.33
EV / EBITDA	26.58	22.02
FCF yield	1.41%	2.11%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	VST
Gross margin	11.59%	12.72%
Operating margin	8.13%	2.07%
Net margin	7.16%	13.82%
ROE	45.07%	40.04%
ROIC	27.74%	3.30%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	VST
Dividend yield	N/A	0.58%
Payout ratio	N/A	41.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	VST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	6.97%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	11.20%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	-42.65%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	105.32%	53.22%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or VST?: VST has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and VST at 26.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or VST?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus VST at 6.97%.
Does CLS or VST pay a bigger dividend?: VST pays a dividend (0.58% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or VST more profitable?: VST runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus VST at 13.82%.
How have CLS and VST total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and VST delivered 53.22% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full VST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Vistra P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Vistra dividend yield Celestica ROE Vistra ROE Celestica operating margin Vistra operating margin Celestica revenue growth Vistra revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Vistra free cash flow

Celestica & Vistra appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.