Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; VRT is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
$269.56IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs VRT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yCLS +2660.9%VRT +2835.1%VRT compounded faster
CLS VRT
CLS vs VRT: by the numbers
- •VRT is the larger company ($103.54B vs $40.26B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 72.26 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 18.86% CAGR).
- •VRT pays a dividend (0.08% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 72.26 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 44.34 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 10.40 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 26.57 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 0.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 48.36 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 2.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 36.16% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 18.54% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 14.37% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 36.71% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 18.55% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.08% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 6.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 18.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 79.41% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 41.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 59.88% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or VRT?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and VRT at 72.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or VRT?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
- Does CLS or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- VRT pays a dividend (0.08% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or VRT more profitable?
- VRT runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus VRT at 14.37%.
- How have CLS and VRT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and VRT delivered 59.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldVertiv dividend yieldCelestica ROEVertiv ROECelestica operating marginVertiv operating marginCelestica revenue growthVertiv revenue growthCelestica free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Celestica & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.