Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; VRT is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
$257.06IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs VRT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yCLS +2419.0% (+49.7%/yr)VRT +2582.9% (+50.9%/yr)VRT compounded faster over this window
CLS VRT
CLS vs VRT: by the numbers
- •VRT is the larger company ($98.97B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 58.16 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •VRT converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 18.93% CAGR).
- •VRT pays a dividend (0.09% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 58.16 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 38.23 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 8.62 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 20.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 39.13 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 2.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 37.52% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 19.12% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 15.09% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 36.40% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 20.78% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 5.09% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 18.93% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 50.29% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 60.16% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or VRT?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and VRT at 58.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or VRT?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
- Does CLS or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- VRT pays a dividend (0.09% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or VRT more profitable?
- VRT runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus VRT at 15.09%.
- How have CLS and VRT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 106.10% and VRT delivered 60.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioVertiv dividend yieldCelestica ROEVertiv ROECelestica operating marginVertiv operating marginCelestica revenue growthVertiv revenue growthCelestica free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Celestica & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.