Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Valero Energy Corporation (VLO)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Valero Energy Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; VLO is classified in Energy. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
$390.42EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs VLO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +2914.0% (+40.6%/yr)VLO +921.9% (+26.2%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS VLO
CLS vs VLO: by the numbers
- •VLO is the larger company ($112.41B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •VLO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.19 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 5.43% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 10.43% CAGR).
- •VLO pays a dividend (1.22% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 16.19 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 8.91 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 0.85 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 4.50 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 8.85 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 9.00% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 11.33% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 7.53% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 5.43% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 28.85% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 16.52% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.22% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 19.62% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 10.43% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 4.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 75.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 48.27% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or VLO?
- VLO has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and VLO at 16.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or VLO?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus VLO at 10.43%.
- Does CLS or VLO pay a bigger dividend?
- VLO pays a dividend (1.22% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or VLO more profitable?
- CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus VLO at 5.43%.
- How have CLS and VLO total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and VLO delivered 26.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioValero Energy P/E ratioValero Energy dividend yieldCelestica ROEValero Energy ROECelestica operating marginValero Energy operating marginCelestica revenue growthValero Energy revenue growthCelestica free cash flowValero Energy free cash flow
Celestica & Valero Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.