Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$362.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
$19.29TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs UMC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 26yCLS +389.4%UMC +303.4%CLS compounded faster
CLS UMC
CLS vs UMC: by the numbers
- •UMC is the larger company ($48.12B vs $41.71B market cap).
- •UMC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.09 vs 37.67 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •UMC converts more revenue to profit (33.14% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 9.39% CAGR).
- •UMC pays a dividend (2.14% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.67 | 6.09 |
| Forward P/E | 31.90 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 2.70 | 1.21 |
| P/B ratio | 17.00 | 0.70 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 1.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.35 | 2.09 |
| FCF yield | 1.23% | 19.42% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 30.60% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 19.71% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 33.14% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 18.99% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 7.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 2.14% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 77.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 9.39% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 4.35% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 6.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 110.89% | 16.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or UMC?
- UMC has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 37.67 and UMC at 6.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or UMC?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus UMC at 9.39%.
- Does CLS or UMC pay a bigger dividend?
- UMC pays a dividend (2.14% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or UMC more profitable?
- UMC runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus UMC at 33.14%.
- How have CLS and UMC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 41.68% and UMC delivered 31.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioUnited Microelectronics P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldUnited Microelectronics dividend yieldCelestica ROEUnited Microelectronics ROECelestica operating marginUnited Microelectronics operating marginCelestica revenue growthUnited Microelectronics revenue growthCelestica free cash flowUnited Microelectronics free cash flow
Celestica & United Microelectronics appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 6, 2026.