Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or STRL?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and STRL at 56.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or STRL?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.

Is CLS or STRL more profitable?

STRL runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus STRL at 12.02%.

How have CLS and STRL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and STRL delivered 60.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; STRL is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$40.26B

$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

STRL

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.

$16.51B

$538.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs STRL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28y

CLS +3522.3%STRL +79721.9%STRL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CLS STRL

CLS vs STRL: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($40.26B vs $16.51B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 56.76 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•STRL converts more revenue to profit (12.02% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 14.81% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	STRL
P/E ratio	33.05	56.76
Forward P/E	31.47	33.59
P/S ratio	2.37	6.83
P/B ratio	14.91	16.56
PEG ratio	0.39	2.34
EV / EBITDA	26.58	33.62
FCF yield	1.41%	2.24%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	STRL
Gross margin	11.59%	23.29%
Operating margin	8.13%	17.25%
Net margin	7.16%	12.02%
ROE	45.07%	29.14%
ROIC	27.74%	19.06%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	STRL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	14.81%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	44.28%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	31.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	105.32%	97.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or STRL?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and STRL at 56.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or STRL?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.
Is CLS or STRL more profitable?: STRL runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus STRL at 12.02%.
How have CLS and STRL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and STRL delivered 60.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full STRL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Sterling Infrastructure P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Sterling Infrastructure dividend yield Celestica ROE Sterling Infrastructure ROE Celestica operating margin Sterling Infrastructure operating margin Celestica revenue growth Sterling Infrastructure revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Sterling Infrastructure free cash flow

Celestica & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.