Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or STRL?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and STRL at 36.84. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or STRL?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus STRL at 18.89%.

Is CLS or STRL more profitable?

STRL runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus STRL at 12.55%.

How have CLS and STRL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and STRL delivered 53.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; STRL is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

STRL

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.

$15.68B

$511.04IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs STRL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2732.2% (+39.7%/yr)STRL +7024.5% (+53.2%/yr)STRL compounded faster over this window

CLS STRL

CLS vs STRL: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $15.68B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 36.84 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•STRL converts more revenue to profit (12.55% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 18.89% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	STRL
P/E ratio	35.99	36.84
Forward P/E	30.38	25.81
P/S ratio	2.55	4.56
P/B ratio	16.07	11.55
EV / EBITDA	27.75	21.79
FCF yield	1.30%	3.06%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	STRL
Gross margin	11.59%	23.59%
Operating margin	8.13%	18.06%
Net margin	7.16%	12.55%
ROE	45.07%	31.79%
ROIC	29.75%	24.77%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	STRL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	18.89%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	44.28%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	32.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	106.10%	86.00%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or STRL?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and STRL at 36.84. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or STRL?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus STRL at 18.89%.
Is CLS or STRL more profitable?: STRL runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus STRL at 12.55%.
How have CLS and STRL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and STRL delivered 53.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full STRL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Sterling Infrastructure P/E ratio Celestica ROE Sterling Infrastructure ROE Celestica operating margin Sterling Infrastructure operating margin Celestica revenue growth Sterling Infrastructure revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Sterling Infrastructure free cash flow

Celestica & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.