Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or STM?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.50 and STM at 102.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or STM?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus STM at 1.90%.

Does CLS or STM pay a bigger dividend?

STM pays a dividend (0.69% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or STM more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus STM at 3.55%.

How have CLS and STM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.80% and STM delivered 23.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$42.02B

$365.49TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 4, 2026, 11:40 AM EDT

STM

STMicroelectronics N.V.

$48.35B

$54.17TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 4, 2026, 11:40 AM EDT

Total return — CLS vs STM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28y

CLS +3547.0%STM +631.2%CLS compounded faster

CLS STM

CLS vs STM: by the numbers

•STM is the larger company ($48.35B vs $42.02B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.50 vs 102.33 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 3.55% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 1.90% CAGR).
•STM pays a dividend (0.69% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	STM
P/E ratio	35.50	102.33
Forward P/E	30.07	39.05
P/S ratio	2.54	3.70
P/B ratio	16.02	2.74
PEG ratio	0.39	N/A
EV / EBITDA	27.67	23.11
FCF yield	1.31%	0.87%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	STM
Gross margin	11.59%	34.29%
Operating margin	8.13%	5.23%
Net margin	7.16%	3.55%
ROE	45.07%	2.64%
ROIC	27.74%	0.67%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	STM
Dividend yield	N/A	0.69%
Payout ratio	N/A	189.47%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	STM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	1.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	-31.29%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	-16.70%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	106.59%	5.36%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or STM?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.50 and STM at 102.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or STM?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus STM at 1.90%.
Does CLS or STM pay a bigger dividend?: STM pays a dividend (0.69% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or STM more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus STM at 3.55%.
How have CLS and STM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.80% and STM delivered 23.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full STM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio STMicroelectronics P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield STMicroelectronics dividend yield Celestica ROE STMicroelectronics ROE Celestica operating margin STMicroelectronics operating margin Celestica revenue growth STMicroelectronics revenue growth Celestica free cash flow STMicroelectronics free cash flow

Celestica & STMicroelectronics appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 4, 2026.