Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or STM?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 34.28 and STM at 96.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or STM?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus STM at 1.90%.

Does CLS or STM pay a bigger dividend?

STM pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or STM more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus STM at 3.55%.

How have CLS and STM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 41.66% and STM delivered 22.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$37.96B

$330.11TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 2:55 PM EDT

STM

STMicroelectronics N.V.

$44.14B

$49.45TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 2:55 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs STM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +3271.1% (+42.2%/yr)STM +640.6% (+22.2%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

CLS STM

CLS vs STM: by the numbers

•STM is the larger company ($44.14B vs $37.96B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.28 vs 96.96 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 3.55% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 1.90% CAGR).
•STM pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	STM
P/E ratio	34.28	96.96
Forward P/E	29.09	36.37
P/S ratio	2.43	3.37
P/B ratio	15.31	2.50
EV / EBITDA	26.45	21.10
FCF yield	1.37%	0.49%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	STM
Gross margin	11.59%	34.29%
Operating margin	8.13%	5.23%
Net margin	7.16%	3.55%
ROE	45.07%	2.64%
ROIC	29.75%	1.88%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	STM
Dividend yield	N/A	0.70%
Payout ratio	N/A	70.59%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	STM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	1.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	-31.29%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	-27.07%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	108.65%	3.62%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or STM?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 34.28 and STM at 96.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or STM?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus STM at 1.90%.
Does CLS or STM pay a bigger dividend?: STM pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or STM more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus STM at 3.55%.
How have CLS and STM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 41.66% and STM delivered 22.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full STM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio STMicroelectronics P/E ratio STMicroelectronics dividend yield Celestica ROE STMicroelectronics ROE Celestica operating margin STMicroelectronics operating margin Celestica revenue growth STMicroelectronics revenue growth Celestica free cash flow STMicroelectronics free cash flow

Celestica & STMicroelectronics appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.