Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; SMEGF is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SMEGF
Siemens Energy AG
$158.00IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 3:54 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs SMEGF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yCLS +4821.6%SMEGF +557.6%CLS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS SMEGF
CLS vs SMEGF: by the numbers
- •SMEGF is the larger company ($135.14B vs $40.26B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 56.03 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 6.15% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 7.98% CAGR).
- •SMEGF pays a dividend (0.49% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 56.03 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 33.63 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 3.09 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 11.66 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 1.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 24.57 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 4.91% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 18.82% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 7.96% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 6.15% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 23.20% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 9.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.49% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 36.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 7.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 45.13% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 47.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 44.94% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or SMEGF?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and SMEGF at 56.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or SMEGF?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.
- Does CLS or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?
- SMEGF pays a dividend (0.49% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or SMEGF more profitable?
- CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.
- How have CLS and SMEGF total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and SMEGF delivered 44.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldSiemens Energy AG dividend yieldCelestica ROESiemens Energy AG ROECelestica operating marginSiemens Energy AG operating marginCelestica revenue growthSiemens Energy AG revenue growthCelestica free cash flowSiemens Energy AG free cash flow
Celestica & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.