Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; SMEGF is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SMEGF
Siemens Energy AG
$165.64IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:53 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs SMEGF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yCLS +4390.4% (+88.5%/yr)SMEGF +569.1% (+37.3%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS SMEGF
CLS vs SMEGF: by the numbers
- •SMEGF is the larger company ($141.68B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 46.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 7.00% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 7.96% CAGR).
- •SMEGF pays a dividend (0.48% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 46.08 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 2.91 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 11.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 21.34 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 6.51% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 20.74% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 9.00% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 7.00% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 27.86% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 14.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.48% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 22.74% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 7.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 45.13% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 62.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 45.32% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or SMEGF?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and SMEGF at 46.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or SMEGF?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.96%.
- Does CLS or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?
- SMEGF pays a dividend (0.48% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or SMEGF more profitable?
- CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus SMEGF at 7.00%.
- How have CLS and SMEGF total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 106.10% and SMEGF delivered 45.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG dividend yieldCelestica ROESiemens Energy AG ROECelestica operating marginSiemens Energy AG operating marginCelestica revenue growthSiemens Energy AG revenue growthCelestica free cash flowSiemens Energy AG free cash flow
Celestica & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.