Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or SEZL?

SEZL has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and SEZL at 25.95. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or SEZL?

Over the past five years, SEZL grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus SEZL at 42.22%.

Is CLS or SEZL more profitable?

SEZL runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus SEZL at 30.35%.

How have CLS and SEZL total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 106.10% and SEZL delivered 55.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Sezzle Inc. (SEZL)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Sezzle Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; SEZL is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SEZL

Sezzle Inc.

$4.00B

$118.87Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs SEZL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

CLS +3929.1% (+85.2%/yr)SEZL +2828.5% (+75.6%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

CLS SEZL

CLS vs SEZL: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $4.00B market cap).
•SEZL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (25.95 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SEZL converts more revenue to profit (30.35% vs 7.16% net margin).
•SEZL grew revenue faster over the past five years (42.22% vs 22.80% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	SEZL
P/E ratio	35.99	25.95
Forward P/E	30.38	22.66
P/S ratio	2.55	7.52
P/B ratio	16.07	17.16
EV / EBITDA	27.75	N/A
FCF yield	1.30%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CLS	SEZL
Gross margin	11.59%	90.80%
Operating margin	8.13%	40.39%
Net margin	7.16%	30.35%
ROE	45.07%	69.29%
ROIC	29.75%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	SEZL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	42.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	106.10%	55.62%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or SEZL?: SEZL has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and SEZL at 25.95. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or SEZL?: Over the past five years, SEZL grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus SEZL at 42.22%.
Is CLS or SEZL more profitable?: SEZL runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus SEZL at 30.35%.
How have CLS and SEZL total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CLS delivered 106.10% and SEZL delivered 55.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full SEZL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Sezzle P/E ratio Celestica ROE Sezzle ROE Celestica operating margin Sezzle operating margin Celestica revenue growth Sezzle revenue growth Celestica free cash flow

Celestica & Sezzle appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.