Which has grown faster, CLS or RYCEY?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus RYCEY at 12.71%.

Does CLS or RYCEY pay a bigger dividend?

RYCEY pays a dividend (0.75% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or RYCEY more profitable?

RYCEY runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus RYCEY at 26.94%.

How have CLS and RYCEY total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and RYCEY delivered 8.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; RYCEY is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

RYCEY

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc

$163.75B

$19.65IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs RYCEY

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2914.0% (+40.6%/yr)RYCEY +110.5% (+7.7%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CLS RYCEY

CLS vs RYCEY: by the numbers

•RYCEY is the larger company ($163.75B vs $39.85B market cap).
•RYCEY converts more revenue to profit (26.94% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 12.71% CAGR).
•RYCEY pays a dividend (0.75% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	RYCEY
P/E ratio	35.99	N/A
Forward P/E	30.38	N/A
P/S ratio	2.55	N/A
P/B ratio	16.07	43.29
EV / EBITDA	27.75	N/A
FCF yield	1.30%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CLS	RYCEY
Gross margin	11.59%	29.12%
Operating margin	8.13%	16.82%
Net margin	7.16%	26.94%
ROE	45.07%	209.94%
ROIC	29.75%	15.14%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	RYCEY
Dividend yield	N/A	0.75%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	RYCEY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	12.71%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	26.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	106.10%	68.29%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CLS or RYCEY?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus RYCEY at 12.71%.
Does CLS or RYCEY pay a bigger dividend?: RYCEY pays a dividend (0.75% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or RYCEY more profitable?: RYCEY runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus RYCEY at 26.94%.
How have CLS and RYCEY total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and RYCEY delivered 8.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full RYCEY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Rolls-Royce dividend yield Celestica ROE Rolls-Royce ROE Celestica operating margin Rolls-Royce operating margin Celestica revenue growth Rolls-Royce revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Rolls-Royce free cash flow

Celestica & Rolls-Royce appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.