Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$347.63TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 13, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
$397.50TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 13, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs ROP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +2986.0% (+40.9%/yr)ROP +144.7% (+9.4%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS ROP
CLS vs ROP: by the numbers
- •ROP is the larger company ($40.11B vs $39.97B market cap).
- •ROP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.47 vs 35.25 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ROP converts more revenue to profit (30.24% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 10.18% CAGR).
- •ROP pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.25 | 16.47 |
| Forward P/E | 29.85 | 17.82 |
| P/S ratio | 2.53 | 4.90 |
| P/B ratio | 15.91 | 2.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.47 | 14.96 |
| FCF yield | 1.32% | 6.47% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 69.53% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 27.97% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 30.24% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 13.39% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 5.62% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.90% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 24.84% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 10.18% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 9.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 9.89% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 107.68% | -3.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or ROP?
- ROP has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.25 and ROP at 16.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or ROP?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus ROP at 10.18%.
- Does CLS or ROP pay a bigger dividend?
- ROP pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or ROP more profitable?
- ROP runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus ROP at 30.24%.
- How have CLS and ROP total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.92% and ROP delivered 9.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioRoper Technologies P/E ratioRoper Technologies dividend yieldCelestica ROERoper Technologies ROECelestica operating marginRoper Technologies operating marginCelestica revenue growthRoper Technologies revenue growthCelestica free cash flowRoper Technologies free cash flow
Celestica & Roper Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.