Is CLS or ROP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: CLS trades at a 43.65 P/E and ROP at 20.76.

Which has grown faster, CLS or ROP?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.

Does CLS or ROP pay a bigger dividend?

ROP pays a dividend (1.10% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.

Is CLS or ROP more profitable?

ROP runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus ROP at 21.12%.

Which has been the better investment, CLS or ROP?

Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 42.83% versus ROP at 7.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)

CLS and ROP are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Roper Technologies, Inc.

$34.24B

$332.42Technology

Total return — CLS vs ROP

growth of $100 · last 28y

CLS +3572.1%ROP +2542.7%CLS compounded faster

CLS ROP

CLS vs ROP: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($39.60B vs $34.24B market cap).
•ROP trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.76 vs 43.65 P/E).
•ROP converts more revenue to profit (21.12% vs 6.95% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 9.25% CAGR).
•ROP pays a dividend (1.10% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CLS or ROP?

Metric tally: CLS 8 · ROP 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueROP(lower P/E)

GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	ROP
P/E ratio	43.65	20.76●
Forward P/E	36.45	15.17●
P/S ratio	3.03●	4.28
P/B ratio	20.41	1.85●
PEG ratio	0.39●	2.18
EV / EBITDA	33.47	13.20●
FCF yield	1.18%	7.34%●

Profitability

Metric	CLS	ROP
Gross margin	11.61%	69.40%●
Operating margin	7.84%	28.09%●
Net margin	6.95%	21.12%●
ROE	46.86%●	9.11%
ROIC	27.74%●	5.62%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	ROP
Dividend yield	—	1.10%
Payout ratio	—	25.44%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	ROP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.51%●	9.25%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%●	9.53%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.52%●	8.90%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	111.62%●	-5.62%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CLS or ROP?: It depends on your goal. value: ROP (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is CLS or ROP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: CLS trades at a 43.65 P/E and ROP at 20.76.
Which has grown faster, CLS or ROP?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.
Does CLS or ROP pay a bigger dividend?: ROP pays a dividend (1.10% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.
Is CLS or ROP more profitable?: ROP runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus ROP at 21.12%.
Which has been the better investment, CLS or ROP?: Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 42.83% versus ROP at 7.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full ROP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Roper Technologies P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Roper Technologies dividend yield Celestica ROE Roper Technologies ROE Celestica operating margin Roper Technologies operating margin Celestica revenue growth Roper Technologies revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Roper Technologies free cash flow

Celestica & Roper Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.