Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; PWR is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
$650.58IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs PWR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +2914.0% (+40.6%/yr)PWR +2358.3% (+37.7%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS PWR
CLS vs PWR: by the numbers
- •PWR is the larger company ($97.81B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 74.52 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 4.08% net margin).
- •PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.02% vs 22.80% CAGR).
- •PWR pays a dividend (0.07% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 74.52 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 38.90 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 2.98 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 10.15 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 34.67 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 2.44% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 14.42% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 6.20% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 4.08% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 13.88% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 8.49% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.07% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 4.93% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 23.02% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 16.88% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 42.82% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 40.73% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or PWR?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and PWR at 74.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or PWR?
- Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.
- Does CLS or PWR pay a bigger dividend?
- PWR pays a dividend (0.07% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or PWR more profitable?
- CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus PWR at 4.08%.
- How have CLS and PWR total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and PWR delivered 38.12% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioQuanta Services P/E ratioQuanta Services dividend yieldCelestica ROEQuanta Services ROECelestica operating marginQuanta Services operating marginCelestica revenue growthQuanta Services revenue growthCelestica free cash flowQuanta Services free cash flow
Celestica & Quanta Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.