Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; POWL is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$182.50IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs POWL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +2914.0% (+40.6%/yr)POWL +2673.0% (+39.4%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS POWL
CLS vs POWL: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $6.65B market cap).
- •POWL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.98 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •POWL converts more revenue to profit (16.49% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 20.49% CAGR).
- •POWL pays a dividend (0.20% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 34.98 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 33.89 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 5.74 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 8.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 25.48 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 3.67% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 30.08% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 19.67% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 16.49% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 25.24% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 22.63% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.20% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 6.87% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 20.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 59.98% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 38.80% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 92.30% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or POWL?
- POWL has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and POWL at 34.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or POWL?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus POWL at 20.49%.
- Does CLS or POWL pay a bigger dividend?
- POWL pays a dividend (0.20% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or POWL more profitable?
- POWL runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus POWL at 16.49%.
- How have CLS and POWL total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and POWL delivered 39.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioPowell Industries P/E ratioPowell Industries dividend yieldCelestica ROEPowell Industries ROECelestica operating marginPowell Industries operating marginCelestica revenue growthPowell Industries revenue growthCelestica free cash flowPowell Industries free cash flow
Celestica & Powell Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.