Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; POWL is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$201.00IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs POWL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCLS +3522.3%POWL +12716.5%POWL compounded faster
CLS POWL
CLS vs POWL: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($40.26B vs $7.32B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 42.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •POWL converts more revenue to profit (16.51% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 19.84% CAGR).
- •POWL pays a dividend (0.16% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 42.85 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 39.49 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 7.08 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 11.30 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 1.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 32.24 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 2.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 30.10% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 19.76% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 16.51% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 26.36% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 25.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.16% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 19.84% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 59.98% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 34.56% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 95.11% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or POWL?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and POWL at 42.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or POWL?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
- Does CLS or POWL pay a bigger dividend?
- POWL pays a dividend (0.16% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or POWL more profitable?
- POWL runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus POWL at 16.51%.
- How have CLS and POWL total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and POWL delivered 43.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioPowell Industries P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldPowell Industries dividend yieldCelestica ROEPowell Industries ROECelestica operating marginPowell Industries operating marginCelestica revenue growthPowell Industries revenue growthCelestica free cash flowPowell Industries free cash flow
Celestica & Powell Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.