Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or P?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 31.87 and P at 152.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or P?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.

Is CLS or P more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus P at 5.75%.

How have CLS and P total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 39.86% and P delivered 24.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Everpure, Inc. (P)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Everpure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 25, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$35.28B

$306.86TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Everpure, Inc.

$34.16B

$102.78TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs P

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2671.1% (+39.4%/yr)P +755.1% (+23.9%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

CLS P

CLS vs P: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($35.28B vs $34.16B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.87 vs 152.24 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 5.75% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 17.87% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	P
P/E ratio	31.87	152.24
Forward P/E	26.84	51.64
P/S ratio	2.28	8.33
P/B ratio	14.38	22.75
EV / EBITDA	24.85	100.58
FCF yield	1.46%	1.57%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	P
Gross margin	11.59%	70.23%
Operating margin	8.13%	4.21%
Net margin	7.16%	5.75%
ROE	45.07%	15.69%
ROIC	29.75%	5.09%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	P
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	17.87%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	47.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	101.99%	37.18%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or P?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 31.87 and P at 152.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or P?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.
Is CLS or P more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus P at 5.75%.
How have CLS and P total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 39.86% and P delivered 24.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full P analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Everpure P/E ratio Celestica ROE Everpure ROE Celestica operating margin Everpure operating margin Celestica revenue growth Everpure revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Everpure free cash flow

Celestica & Everpure appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 25, 2026.