Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)
CLS and NTAP are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and NetApp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$307.34TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NTAP
NetApp, Inc.
$161.16TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs NTAP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCLS +3178.3%NTAP +4611.8%NTAP compounded faster
CLS NTAP
CLS vs NTAP: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($35.34B vs $31.57B market cap).
- •NTAP trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.34 vs 37.12 P/E).
- •NTAP converts more revenue to profit (18.43% vs 6.95% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 4.18% CAGR).
- •NTAP pays a dividend (1.29% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CLS or NTAP?
Metric tally: CLS 8 · NTAP 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNTAP(lower P/E)
GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCLS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.12 | 25.34● |
| Forward P/E | 30.45 | 20.19● |
| P/S ratio | 2.57● | 4.63 |
| P/B ratio | 17.36● | 23.74 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39● | 1.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.51 | 17.50● |
| FCF yield | 1.39% | 5.83%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.61% | 70.74%● |
| Operating margin | 7.84% | 24.12%● |
| Net margin | 6.95% | 18.43%● |
| ROE | 46.86% | 94.45%● |
| ROIC | 27.74%● | 19.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.29% |
| Payout ratio | — | 32.35% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 19.51%● | 4.18% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33%● | 10.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 26.52%● | 12.50% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 111.48%● | 18.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CLS or NTAP?
- It depends on your goal. value: NTAP (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is CLS or NTAP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NTAP is cheaper: CLS trades at a 37.12 P/E and NTAP at 25.34.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or NTAP?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.
- Does CLS or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?
- NTAP pays a dividend (1.29% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.
- Is CLS or NTAP more profitable?
- NTAP runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus NTAP at 18.43%.
- Which has been the better investment, CLS or NTAP?
- Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 40.76% versus NTAP at 23.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioNetApp P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldNetApp dividend yieldCelestica ROENetApp ROECelestica operating marginNetApp operating marginCelestica revenue growthNetApp revenue growthCelestica free cash flowNetApp free cash flow
Celestica & NetApp appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.