Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or NTAP?

NTAP has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 32.17 and NTAP at 25.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or NTAP?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.61%.

Does CLS or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?

NTAP pays a dividend (1.15% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or NTAP more profitable?

NTAP runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus NTAP at 19.19%.

How have CLS and NTAP total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 39.72% and NTAP delivered 20.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and NetApp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$35.63B

$309.84TechnologyAt close: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

$36.38B

$185.38TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs NTAP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2592.6% (+39.0%/yr)NTAP +562.1% (+20.8%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

CLS NTAP

CLS vs NTAP: by the numbers

•NTAP is the larger company ($36.38B vs $35.63B market cap).
•NTAP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (25.50 vs 32.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NTAP converts more revenue to profit (19.19% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 4.61% CAGR).
•NTAP pays a dividend (1.15% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	NTAP
P/E ratio	32.17	25.50
Forward P/E	27.27	22.64
P/S ratio	2.31	4.89
P/B ratio	14.52	24.18
EV / EBITDA	25.09	18.31
FCF yield	1.44%	4.56%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	NTAP
Gross margin	11.59%	70.63%
Operating margin	8.13%	24.96%
Net margin	7.16%	19.19%
ROE	45.07%	94.85%
ROIC	29.75%	20.63%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	NTAP
Dividend yield	N/A	1.15%
Payout ratio	N/A	32.35%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	NTAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	4.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	14.39%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	7.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	101.42%	17.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or NTAP?: NTAP has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 32.17 and NTAP at 25.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or NTAP?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.61%.
Does CLS or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?: NTAP pays a dividend (1.15% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or NTAP more profitable?: NTAP runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus NTAP at 19.19%.
How have CLS and NTAP total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 39.72% and NTAP delivered 20.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full NTAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio NetApp P/E ratio NetApp dividend yield Celestica ROE NetApp ROE Celestica operating margin NetApp operating margin Celestica revenue growth NetApp revenue growth Celestica free cash flow NetApp free cash flow

Celestica & NetApp appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 4, 2026.