Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Natural Resource Partners L.P. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; NRP is classified in Energy. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NRP
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
$111.10EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs NRP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)NRP +681.6% (+22.8%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS NRP
CLS vs NRP: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $1.47B market cap).
- •NRP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.17 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NRP converts more revenue to profit (54.00% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 7.90% CAGR).
- •NRP pays a dividend (2.83% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | NRP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 14.17 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 24.94 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 7.60 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 2.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 9.99 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 10.86% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | NRP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 81.55% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 62.58% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 54.00% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 16.09% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 16.32% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | NRP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 2.83% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 39.80% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | NRP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 7.90% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 16.63% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 47.46% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or NRP?
- NRP has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and NRP at 14.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or NRP?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus NRP at 7.90%.
- Does CLS or NRP pay a bigger dividend?
- NRP pays a dividend (2.83% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or NRP more profitable?
- NRP runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus NRP at 54.00%.
- How have CLS and NRP total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and NRP delivered 23.50% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioNatural Resource Partners L.P. P/E ratioNatural Resource Partners L.P. dividend yieldCelestica ROENatural Resource Partners L.P. ROECelestica operating marginNatural Resource Partners L.P. operating marginCelestica revenue growthNatural Resource Partners L.P. revenue growthCelestica free cash flowNatural Resource Partners L.P. free cash flow
Celestica & Natural Resource Partners L.P. appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.