Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or MU?

MU has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and MU at 22.07. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or MU?

Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus MU at 29.33%.

Does CLS or MU pay a bigger dividend?

MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or MU more profitable?

MU runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus MU at 55.91%.

How have CLS and MU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and MU delivered 50.50% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Micron Technology, Inc.

$1.10T

$975.26TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs MU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)MU +5635.1% (+49.9%/yr)MU compounded faster over this window

CLS MU

CLS vs MU: by the numbers

•MU is the larger company ($1.10T vs $39.85B market cap).
•MU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.07 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MU converts more revenue to profit (55.91% vs 7.16% net margin).
•MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.33% vs 22.80% CAGR).
•MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	MU
P/E ratio	35.99	22.07
Forward P/E	30.38	6.28
P/S ratio	2.55	12.20
P/B ratio	16.07	10.94
EV / EBITDA	27.75	15.83
FCF yield	1.30%	2.38%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	MU
Gross margin	11.59%	39.79%
Operating margin	8.13%	26.41%
Net margin	7.16%	55.91%
ROE	45.07%	50.11%
ROIC	29.75%	44.23%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	MU
Dividend yield	N/A	0.05%
Payout ratio	N/A	1.20%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	MU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	29.33%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	25.98%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	172.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	106.10%	68.65%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or MU?: MU has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and MU at 22.07. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or MU?: Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus MU at 29.33%.
Does CLS or MU pay a bigger dividend?: MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or MU more profitable?: MU runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus MU at 55.91%.
How have CLS and MU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and MU delivered 50.50% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full MU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Micron Technology P/E ratio Micron Technology dividend yield Celestica ROE Micron Technology ROE Celestica operating margin Micron Technology operating margin Celestica revenue growth Micron Technology revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Micron Technology free cash flow

Celestica & Micron Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.