Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Marathon Petroleum Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; MPC is classified in Energy. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
$395.93EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs MPC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +2872.8% (+40.4%/yr)MPC +1111.1% (+28.3%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS MPC
CLS vs MPC: by the numbers
- •MPC is the larger company ($115.59B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •MPC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.63 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 5.56% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 11.91% CAGR).
- •MPC pays a dividend (1.02% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 13.63 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 7.63 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 0.75 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 6.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 9.13 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 11.16% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 11.62% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 7.95% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 5.56% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 44.84% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 14.33% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.02% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 13.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 11.91% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 22.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 35.87% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 50.50% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or MPC?
- MPC has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and MPC at 13.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or MPC?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus MPC at 11.91%.
- Does CLS or MPC pay a bigger dividend?
- MPC pays a dividend (1.02% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or MPC more profitable?
- CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus MPC at 5.56%.
- How have CLS and MPC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and MPC delivered 28.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioMarathon Petroleum P/E ratioMarathon Petroleum dividend yieldCelestica ROEMarathon Petroleum ROECelestica operating marginMarathon Petroleum operating marginCelestica revenue growthMarathon Petroleum revenue growthCelestica free cash flowMarathon Petroleum free cash flow
Celestica & Marathon Petroleum appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.