Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Marathon Petroleum Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; MPC is classified in Energy. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
$306.05EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs MPC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 15yCLS +3899.4%MPC +2323.9%CLS compounded faster
CLS MPC
CLS vs MPC: by the numbers
- •MPC is the larger company ($89.35B vs $40.26B market cap).
- •MPC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.38 vs 33.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 3.41% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 14.07% CAGR).
- •MPC pays a dividend (1.25% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 20.38 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 7.86 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 0.68 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 5.50 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 12.33 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 6.19% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 8.80% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 5.02% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 3.41% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 27.65% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 7.03% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.25% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 29.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 14.07% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 22.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 30.60% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 44.51% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or MPC?
- MPC has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and MPC at 20.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or MPC?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus MPC at 14.07%.
- Does CLS or MPC pay a bigger dividend?
- MPC pays a dividend (1.25% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or MPC more profitable?
- CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus MPC at 3.41%.
- How have CLS and MPC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and MPC delivered 27.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioMarathon Petroleum P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldMarathon Petroleum dividend yieldCelestica ROEMarathon Petroleum ROECelestica operating marginMarathon Petroleum operating marginCelestica revenue growthMarathon Petroleum revenue growthCelestica free cash flowMarathon Petroleum free cash flow
Celestica & Marathon Petroleum appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.