Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$311.28TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
$73.02TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs MCHP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +2439.0% (+38.2%/yr)MCHP +186.0% (+11.1%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS MCHP
CLS vs MCHP: by the numbers
- •MCHP is the larger company ($39.65B vs $35.79B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.84 vs 100.92 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MCHP converts more revenue to profit (8.80% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs -2.11% CAGR).
- •MCHP pays a dividend (2.50% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.84 | 100.92 |
| Forward P/E | 24.56 | 46.41 |
| P/S ratio | 2.07 | 7.82 |
| P/B ratio | 13.02 | 6.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.52 | 30.74 |
| FCF yield | 1.61% | 2.77% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 60.19% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 15.52% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 8.80% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 6.98% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 5.01% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 2.50% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 674.07% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | -2.11% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | -16.62% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | -9.94% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 97.24% | 0.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or MCHP?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 28.84 and MCHP at 100.92. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or MCHP?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus MCHP at -2.11%.
- Does CLS or MCHP pay a bigger dividend?
- MCHP pays a dividend (2.50% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or MCHP more profitable?
- MCHP runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus MCHP at 8.80%.
- How have CLS and MCHP total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 38.22% and MCHP delivered 10.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioMicrochip Technology P/E ratioMicrochip Technology dividend yieldCelestica ROEMicrochip Technology ROECelestica operating marginMicrochip Technology operating marginCelestica revenue growthMicrochip Technology revenue growthCelestica free cash flowMicrochip Technology free cash flow
Celestica & Microchip Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.