Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or MANH?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and MANH at 57.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or MANH?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus MANH at 12.69%.

Is CLS or MANH more profitable?

MANH runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus MANH at 18.67%.

How have CLS and MANH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and MANH delivered 13.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Manhattan Associates, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MANH

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

$11.77B

$201.82TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs MANH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)MANH +233.0% (+12.8%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CLS MANH

CLS vs MANH: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $11.77B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 57.83 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MANH converts more revenue to profit (18.67% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 12.69% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	MANH
P/E ratio	35.99	57.83
Forward P/E	30.38	36.71
P/S ratio	2.55	10.45
P/B ratio	16.07	74.71
EV / EBITDA	27.75	41.45
FCF yield	1.30%	3.39%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	MANH
Gross margin	11.59%	54.65%
Operating margin	8.13%	24.33%
Net margin	7.16%	18.67%
ROE	45.07%	133.48%
ROIC	29.75%	90.92%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	MANH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	12.69%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	21.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	19.51%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	106.10%	4.78%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or MANH?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and MANH at 57.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or MANH?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus MANH at 12.69%.
Is CLS or MANH more profitable?: MANH runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus MANH at 18.67%.
How have CLS and MANH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and MANH delivered 13.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full MANH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Manhattan Associates P/E ratio Celestica ROE Manhattan Associates ROE Celestica operating margin Manhattan Associates operating margin Celestica revenue growth Manhattan Associates revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Manhattan Associates free cash flow

Celestica & Manhattan Associates appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.